AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN ACID SOILS OF WHEAT LINES SELECTED FOR HEMATOXYLIN STAINING PATTERN

被引:14
作者
RUIZTORRES, NA [1 ]
CARVER, BF [1 ]
WESTERMAN, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] OKLAHOMA STATE UNIV, DEPT AGRON, STILLWATER, OK 74078 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200010023x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Laboratory screening techniques enable detection of varying degrees of Al tolerance during seedling development, but their application to crop improvement programs must be verified in the field. The objective of this study was to compare agronomic responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) lines differing in hematoxylin-staining pattern under naturally acidic and limed field conditions. Experiments were conducted on Bethany-Kirkland (fine, mixed, thermic Pachic-Udertic Paleustolls) or Grant-Pond Creek (fine-silty, mixed thermic Udic-Pachic Argiustolls) silt loam soil complexes. Four sets of three experimental lines were classified as very susceptible (VS), moderately susceptible (MS), intermediate (I), or tolerant (T) based on hematoxylin staining pattern, and evaluated in limed and unlimed plots as separate experiments in 1988 and 1989. The VS group produced the fewest spikes per square meter and the lowest above-ground biomass and grain yield in the unlimed treatments; no such reductions occurred in the limed treatments. Differences in agronomic performance were found between groups of VS and MS lines, with relatively little differentiation among MS, I, and T groups. Comparison of two sister lines from the VS and T groups revealed a 12% increase in spike density, 11% increase in biomass, and a 14% increase in grain yield of the tolerant sib under acidic conditions. The two sibs performed similarly under limed conditions, except the VS line was superior in grain yield. The hematoxylin staining procedure shows promise for identifying wheat genotypes with potentially high sensitivity to acidic soils in the southern Great Plains.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 107
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   SEEDLING TOLERANCE TO ALUMINUM TOXICITY IN HARD RED WINTER-WHEAT GERMPLASM [J].
CARVER, BF ;
INSKEEP, WP ;
WILSON, NP ;
WESTERMAN, RL .
CROP SCIENCE, 1988, 28 (03) :463-467
[2]  
FOY C. D., 1965, AGRON J, V57, P413
[3]  
Foy C.D., 1983, ISJR, V57, P339
[4]   CHARACTERIZATION OF DIFFERENTIAL ALUMINUM TOLERANCE AMONG VARIETIES OF WHEAT AND BARLEY [J].
FOY, CD ;
FLEMING, AL ;
BURNS, GR ;
ARMIGER, WH .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1967, 31 (04) :513-&
[5]  
GARLANDCAMPBELL KA, 1990, CROP SCI, V30, P1049
[6]   DIFFERENTIAL GENOTYPIC RESPONSE TO DROUGHT STRESS AND SUBSOIL ALUMINUM IN SOYBEAN [J].
GOLDMAN, IL ;
CARTER, TE ;
PATTERSON, RP .
CROP SCIENCE, 1989, 29 (02) :330-334
[7]  
JOHNSON G, 1988, 2240 OKL STAT U EXT
[8]  
KOHLI MM, 1988, WHEAT BREEDING ACID
[9]   DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF WHEAT CULTIVARS TO AL [J].
LAFEVER, HN ;
CAMPBELL, LG ;
FOY, CD .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1977, 69 (04) :563-568
[10]   PLANT VARIETIES AS INDICATORS OF ALUMINUM TOXICITY IN A2 HORIZON OF A NORFOLK SOIL [J].
LONG, FL ;
FOY, CD .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1970, 62 (05) :679-&