EVALUATION OF 200 CONSECUTIVE IOGEL 1103 CAPSULAR-BAG LENSES IMPLANTED THROUGH A SMALL INCISION

被引:29
作者
MENAPACE, R
AMON, M
RADAX, U
机构
[1] The First University Eye Hospital, Vienna
关键词
CAPSULORHEXIS; FAULKNER FOLDER; IOGEL HYDROGEL LENS;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80902-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
We evaluated 200 consecutive IOGEL 1103 capsular bag intraocular lenses. We performed a 5 to 6 mm capsulorhexis and inserted the intraocular lens (IOL) through a 3.5 to 4.0 mm scleral tunnel with a Faulkner folder. Twenty-two cases were combined with trabeculectomy and ten with keratoplasty using a temporary keratoprosthesis. Mean follow-up was six months. The implant centered well and resisted capsular shrinkage. Iris touch to the optic was rare and did not provoke persistent pigment dispersion. In one third of the cases a cleft was discernible between the posterior convex IOL surface and the extended capsule despite thorough aspiration of viscoelastic and debris from the retrolental space. In 8% of cases, white flakes of unknown origin were observed at the IOL-capsule interface. In cases associated with pre-existing iritis or intraoperative iris trauma (iris manipulation, iridectomy, or synechiolysis in glaucoma patients), fibrin exudation as well as iridocapsular synechial formation and macrophage precipitation often ensued. Cellular precipitates, as evaluated by biomicroscopy and specular microscopy, were less pronounced and more transient than on poly(methyl methacrylate) IOLs. Best case visual acuity results were comparable to those with conventional implants; all eyes attained 20/40 or better and 97% achieved 20/25 or better. The 1103 was easier to implant through a capsulorhexis opening and suited the dimensions of the capsular bag better than the PC-12 model.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 264
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Drews RC, Lens implantation: lessons learned from the first million, Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK, 102, pp. 505-509, (1982)
[2]  
Apple DJ, Mamalis N, Loftfield K, Et al., Complications of intraocular lenses. A historical and histopathological review, Surv Ophthalmol, 29, pp. 1-54, (1984)
[3]  
Kaufman HE, Katz J, Valenti J, Et al., Corneal endothelium damage with intraocular lenses: contact adhesion between surgical materials and tissue, Science, 198, pp. 525-527, (1977)
[4]  
Mamalis N, Craig MT, Price FW, Spectrum of Nd:YAG laser-induced intraocular lens damage in explanted lenses, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 495-500, (1990)
[5]  
Packard RBS, Garner A, Arnott EJ, Poly-HEMA as a material for intraocular lens implantation: a preliminary report, Br J Ophthalmol, 65, pp. 585-587, (1981)
[6]  
Barrett G, Constable IJ, Corneal endothelial loss with new intraocular lenses, Am J Ophthalmol, 98, pp. 157-165, (1984)
[7]  
Yalon M, Sheets JW, Reich S, Goldberg EP, Quantitative aspects of endothelium damage due to intraocular lens contacts: effect of hydrophilic polymer graft coatings, Int Congr Ophthalmol, 24, pp. 273-276, (1983)
[8]  
Skelnik DL, Lindstrom RL, Allarakhia L, Et al., Neodymium:YAG laser interaction with Alcon IOGEL hydrogel intraocular lenses: an in vitro toxicity assay, J Cataract Refract Surg, 13, pp. 662-668, (1987)
[9]  
Menapace R, Aktueller Stand der Implantation flexibler Intraokularlinsen, Fortschr Ophthalmol, 88, pp. 421-428, (1991)
[10]  
Menapace R, Skorpik, Wedrich A, Evaluation of 150 consecutive cases of poly HEMA posterior chamber lenses implanted in the bag using a small-incision technique, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 567-577, (1990)