COMPARISON OF CARDIAC-OUTPUT MEASURED WITH CONTINUOUS THERMODILUTION AND CARDIAC-OUTPUT CALCULATED WITH THE FICKS PRINCIPLE

被引:3
作者
BIZOUARN, P
BLANLOEIL, Y
PINAUD, M
机构
[1] Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital G. et R. Laennec
[2] Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôtel-Dieu
来源
ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION | 1994年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
Cœur : débit cardiaque; Techniques de mesure : thermodilution;
D O I
10.1016/S0750-7658(05)80725-7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Recently, a thermodilution technique for continuous measurement of cardiac output was introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of continuous cardiac output measurement using the thermodilution technique (CCO) and to assess the correspondence between CCO and cardiac output obtained with the Pick's principle (Pick-CO). Nine patients were studied in the postoperative period after cardiac surgery. A new pulmonary artery catheter modified by attachment of a thermal filament (Intellicath(TM), Model PA3-H-8Fr) was inserted and connected to a continuous cardiac output computer (Vigilance(TM) Monitor). Oxygen consumption was continuously measured using the gas exchange method (Deltatrac Metabolic Monitor(TM)). Fick-CO was calculated according to the Pick's principle. The study in each patient consisted of 6 serial determinations of both CCO and Fick-CO at 10 min intervals. For 54 pairs of measurements, the mean difference (Fick-CO - CCO) was 0,6 L.min(-1). The limits of agreement were - 0,6 to 1,8 L.min(-1) respectively. The relative error was 6% for CCO and 10% for Pick-CO. It is concluded that CCO and Fick-CC cannot be considered as being interchangeable. However, the accuracy of CCO is acceptable. The technique does not require any user calibration and eliminates the need of bolus injections. Further studies are necessary to determine the benefits of this new technique in the various clinical situations.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 689
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Altman, Bland, Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies, The Statistician, 32, pp. 307-317, (1983)
[2]  
Bizouarn, Soulard, Blanloeil, Guillet, Goarin, Oxygen consumption after cardiac surgery. A comparison between calculation by Fick's principle and measurement by indirect calorimetry, Intensive Care Med, 18, pp. 206-209, (1992)
[3]  
Bland, Altman, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet, 1, pp. 307-310, (1985)
[4]  
Carpenter, Nair, Staw, Cardiac output determination : thermodilution versus a new computerized Fick method, Crit Care Med, 13, pp. 576-579, (1985)
[5]  
Davies, Jebson, Glascow, Hess, Continuous Fick cardiac output compared to thermodilution cardiac output, Crit Care Med, 14, pp. 881-885, (1986)
[6]  
Iparraguirre, Giniger, Garber, Quiroga, Jorge, Comparison between measured and fick-derived values of hemodynamic and oxymetric variables in patients with acute myocardial infarction, The American Journal of Medicine, 85, pp. 349-352, (1988)
[7]  
Jansen, Schreuder, Settles, Kloek, Versprille, An adequate strategy for the thermodilution technique in patients during mechanical ventilation, Intensive Care Med, 16, pp. 422-425, (1990)
[8]  
Keinanen, Takala, Kari, Continuous measurement of cardiac output by the Fick principle, Critical Care Medicine, 20, pp. 360-365, (1992)
[9]  
Van Lanschot, Physical and methodological aspects of metabolic gas-exchange measurement (pp 15–24), Metabolic gas-exchange in critically surgical patients, (1987)
[10]  
Levett, Reploge, Thermodilution cardiac output : a critical analysis and review of the literature, J Surg Res, 27, pp. 392-396, (1979)