THE PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT X-RAY CONTRAST AGENTS - CALCULATIONS USING A MONTE-CARLO MODEL OF THE IMAGING CHAIN

被引:16
作者
SANDBORG, M
CHRISTOFFERSSON, JO
CARLSSON, GA
ALMEN, T
DANCE, DR
机构
[1] LUND UNIV,MALMO GEN HOSP,DEPT RADIAT PHYS,S-21401 MALMO,SWEDEN
[2] LUND UNIV,MALMO GEN HOSP,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,S-21401 MALMO,SWEDEN
[3] ROYAL MARSDEN NHS TRUST,JOINT DEPT PHYS,LONDON SW3 6JJ,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/40/7/005
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A Monte Carlo computational model of the imaging chain has been used to investigate the performance of x-ray contrast agents with atomic number, Z, 53 less than or equal to Z less than or equal to 90 with respect to physical image quality descriptors (contrast and signal to noise ratio, SNR) and patient mean absorbed dose. Contrast agents of equal molar concentrations were used within a water slab (simulating the patient). The imaging conditions were chosen to represent adult and paediatric examinations. For all tube potentials studied (40-140 kV), the contrast agents with the highest atomic numbers (bismuth and thorium) gave the highest contrast. In analogue screen-film imaging, several other contrast agents could produce a higher image contrast than iodine in a limited range of tube potentials. This advantage could alternatively be effected as a reduced amount of administered contrast agent, or as a reduced mean absorbed dose in the patient. In digital imaging, a lower mean absorbed dose for a constant SNR than that with iodine can be achieved for ranges of tube potentials and contrast agents. Bismuth and thorium yield a lower dose than iodine at all studied tube potentials. Gadolinium and erbium could alternatively be used at a broad range of tube potentials above 90 kV with a dose penalty of only 5-20%.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1224
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ANN ICRP, V60
[2]  
ARTHUR RJ, 1992, QUALITY CRITERIA DIA
[3]  
Berger MJ, 1987, NBSIR873597 US DEP C
[4]  
BIRCH R, 1979, HOSPITAL PHYSICISTS, V30
[5]   EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL X-RAY-IMAGING PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF IODINE AND LANTHANIDE CONTRAST AGENTS [J].
CARDINAL, HN ;
HOLDSWORTH, DW ;
DRANGOVA, M ;
HOBBS, BB ;
FENSTER, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (01) :15-31
[6]  
CARLSSON CA, 1962, RADIOLOGE 2 JAHRGANG, P395
[7]   RELATIONS BETWEEN EFFECTIVE DOSE EQUIVALENT AND MEAN ABSORBED DOSE (ENERGY IMPARTED) TO PATIENTS IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY [J].
CARLSSON, GA ;
CARLSSON, CA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1986, 31 (08) :911-921
[8]   CALCULATION OF DOSE AND CONTRAST FOR 2 MAMMOGRAPHIC GRIDS [J].
DANCE, DR ;
PERSLIDEN, J ;
CARLSSON, GA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (01) :235-248
[9]   IMAGE-INFORMATION TRANSFER PROPERTIES OF X-RAY FLUORESCENT SCREENS [J].
DICK, CE ;
MOTZ, JW .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (03) :337-346
[10]  
FRYAR J, 1990, SPIE, V1231, P246