COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION OF WILD AND CULTIVATED BEANS (PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS)

被引:39
作者
SOTELO, A
SOUSA, H
SANCHEZ, M
机构
[1] Departamento de Farmacia, División de Estudios de Posgrado, Faculdad de Química, Centro de Ecología, Universidad Nacinal Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cd. Universitaria, México DF
[2] Laboratorio de Ecología Fisiológica, Centro de Ecología, Universidad Nacinal Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cd. Universitaria, México DF
来源
PLANT FOODS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION | 1995年 / 47卷 / 02期
关键词
AMINO ACID PROFILE; ANTINUTRITIONAL FACTORS; BEANS; NUTRIENT COMPOSITION; TOXIC FACTORS; WILD BEANS;
D O I
10.1007/BF01089257
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Five wild Phaseolus vulgaris beans were compared with five cultivated Phaseolus vulgaris beans in proximate composition, total (true) protein, amino acid composition, and toxic and antinutritional factors. The wild beans contained more protein (25.5% vs. 21.7%), ash (5.15 vs. 4.15%), crude fiber (7.08% vs. 5.04%) compared to cultivated beans while the former contained less fat (0.56 vs. 0.89%) and carbohydrates (61.64 vs. 68.05%). Sulfur amino acids were found to be limiting in both groups of bean as expected; however, the cultivated beans had a higher content of the limiting amino acids. Therefore, the cultivated beans showed a better amino acid profile than the wild beans. Toxic factors were not found in either type of bean; the determinations included saponins, alkaloids, and cyanogenic glycosides. The antinutritional factors investigated were hemagglutinins (lectins) and trypsin inhibitors. The wild beans presented a higher content of trypsin inhibitors (28 TUI per mg) and lectins (9.6) than the cultivated beans did (21 TUI per mg and 7 respectively). From the chemical point of view, domestication seems to be positive; however, the better protein nutritive quality of the cultivated beans should be further confirmed by biological assays.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Delgado S.A., Manzanilla L., El frijol prehispánico, ICyT, Información Científica y Tecnológica, 12, 168, pp. 52-56, (1990)
[2]  
Delgado S.A., Bonet A., Gepts P., The wild relative of Phaseolus vulgaris in Middle America, Genetic resources of phaseolus beans, pp. 163-184, (1988)
[3]  
Kaplan L., Kaplan L.N., Phaseolus in archeology, Genetic resources of Phaseolus beans, pp. 125-142, (1988)
[4]  
Brucher H., The wild ancestor of Phaseolus vulgaris in South America, Genetic resources of Phaseolus beans, pp. 185-214, (1988)
[5]  
Gepts P., Phaseolin as an evolutionary marker, Genetic resources of Phaseolus beans, pp. 215-241, (1988)
[6]  
Lucas B., Guerrero A., Sotelo A., True protein and nonprotein amino acids present in legume seeds, Nutr Rep Int, 37, pp. 545-553, (1988)
[7]  
Lucas B., Sotelo A., Amino acid determination in pure protein, foods and feeds using two different hydrolysis methods, Anal Biochem, 123, pp. 349-356, (1982)
[8]  
Lucas B., Sotelo A., Effect of different alkalies, temperature and hydrolysis times on tryptophan determination of pure proteins and of foods, Anal Biochem, 109, pp. 192-197, (1980)
[9]  
Pellet P.L., Young V.R., Nutritional evaluation of protein foods, (1980)
[10]  
Abisch E., Reichstein T., Alkaloid screening (Micro method), Helvetica Chimica Acta, 43, pp. 1844-1861, (1960)