AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION LOSSES FROM DIFFERENT FERTILIZERS AND EFFECT OF SEVERAL UREASE INHIBITORS, CACL2 AND PHOSPHOGYPSUM ON LOSSES FROM UREA

被引:30
作者
BAYRAKLI, F
机构
[1] Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Selçuk University, Konya
来源
FERTILIZER RESEARCH | 1990年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
Ammonium sulphate; calcium; diammonium phosphate; hydrolysis; pH; phosphogypsum; urease inhibitors;
D O I
10.1007/BF01073430
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The extent of ammonia volatilization losses from urea, ammonium sulphate (AS), and diammonium phosphate (DAP) were determined in soil incubation studies. The effects of some urease inhibitors (thiourea, hyroquinone, 2-4 dinitro phenol and boric acid) and CaCl2 and phosphogypsum additions on ammonia loss from urea were also studied. Total ammonia volatilization losses were 32.6%, 3.1% and 2.3% of the N applied to the soil as urea, AS and DAP, respectively. Among the chemicals examined in the study, 500 mg H3BO3 in 1 kg of the soil decreased the ammonia loss from urea by 21% in comparison with the control. When 50 mg/kg soil of thiourea, 2-4 dinitro phenol or hydroquinone were applied, ammonia volatilization losses were found to be 10%, 3% and 0% less than urea applied alone, respectively. When 2500 mg CaCl2 was applied to 1 kg of soil with urea, ammonia loss was decreased by 5%. The lowest hydrolysis rate (65%) occurred with the boric acid treatment. The differences between the hydrolysis rates of the other treatments were not statistically significant. Phosphogypsum was found the most effective agent in reducing ammonia losses from urea. When phosphogypsum was mixed at 2.3 times as much as the urea, ammonia loss was about 85% less than that of urea applied alone. Obviously, further work is needed to find out the potential of both boric acid and phosphogypsum as reducing agents of ammonia losses from urea. © 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 150
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Abdel Magid H.M., Mahi Y.E., In vitro effects of urease inhibitors on rate of urea hydrolysis in soils, Fert Res, 8, pp. 203-212, (1986)
[2]  
Bacon P.E., Hoult E.H., McGarity J.W., Ammonia volatilization from fertilizers applied to irrigated wheat soils, Fert Res, 10, pp. 27-42, (1986)
[3]  
De Ferrante B., Van Der Vorm P.D.J., Van Diest A., Comparative studies on the usefulness of ammonium sulphate and urea as fertilizers for lowland rice, Fert Res, 10, pp. 119-133, (1986)
[4]  
Ellington A., Ammonia volatilization losses from fertilizers applied to acid soil in the field, Fert Res, 8, pp. 283-296, (1986)
[5]  
Fenn L.B., Matocha J.E., Wu E., A comparison of calcium carbonate precipitation and pH depression on calcium-reduced loss from surface-applied urea, Soil Sci Soc Am J, 44, pp. 1128-1131, (1986)
[6]  
Fillery I.R.P., Simpson J.R., De Ratta S.K., Contribution of ammonia volatilization to total nitrogen loss after application of urea to wetland rice fields, Fert Res, 8, pp. 193-202, (1986)
[7]  
Fillery I.R.P., Simpson J.R., De Datta S.K., Influence of field environment and fertilizer management on ammonia loss from flooded rice, Soil Sci Am J, 48, pp. 914-920, (1984)
[8]  
Fillery I.R.P., Vlek P.L.G., Reappraisal of the significance of ammonia volatilization as an N loss mechanism in flooded rice fields, Fert Res, 9, pp. 79-98, (1986)
[9]  
Gould W.D., Hagedorn C., McCready R.G.L., Urea transformations and fertilizer efficiency in soil, Advances Agr, 40, pp. 209-238, (1986)
[10]  
Keeney D.R., Nelson D.W., Nitrogen-inorganic forms, Methods of Soil Analysis, (1982)