PREDICTIVE INITIAL PARAMETERS FOR RESPONSE OF STAGE-D PROSTATE-CANCER TO TREATMENT WITH THE LUTEINIZING-HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST GOSERELIN

被引:19
作者
KREIS, W
AHMANN, FR
LESSER, M
SCOTT, M
CAPLAN, R
GAU, T
VINCIGUERRA, V
机构
[1] N SHORE UNIV HOSP,DEPT RES & PUBL HLTH,MANHASSET,NY 11030
[2] VET ADM MED CTR,TUCSON,AZ 85723
[3] UNIV ARIZONA,SCH MED,TUCSON,AZ 85721
[4] ICI INC,PHARMACEUT GRP,WILMINGTON,DE
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1990.8.5.870
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
One hundred eighteen patients with stage D (D1 or D22) prostate cancer with a mean age of 69 years were treated with monthly goserelin (Zolodex; ICI 118, 630; ICI Americas Inc, Wilmington, DE, property of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC) injections and the data were analyzed for predictive parameters for best response and time to treatment failure (National Prostatic Cancer Project [NPCP] and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] criteria). For best response in a univariate analysis, the performance status (PS 0-1 v 2-3) (P = .01), hematocrit (P = .04), and pain (P = .04) were significant. For time to treatment failure by univariate analysis, ECOG performance status (0-1 v 2-3) was most predictive (P < .0001), followed by pain at entry (P = .0002), initial testosterone (T) level (> 250 ng/dL) (P = .0005), age less than 69 years (P = .02), alkaline phosphatase (> 115 IU/L) (P = .03), hemoglobin (< 14 g/dL) (P = .03), whereas normal acid phosphatase (< 3 IU/mL) (P = .29) was not predictive. In multivariate analysis for time to treatment failure, only the ECOG performance status was of significance (P = .01). Estimated median time to treatment failure for PS of 0-1 was 88 weeks and for PS of 2-3 was 31 weeks. © 1990 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 874
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   HORMONAL PATTERN IN PROSTATIC-CANCER .2. CORRELATION WITH PRIMARY RESPONSE TO ENDOCRINE TREATMENT [J].
ADLERCREUTZ, H ;
RANNIKKO, S ;
KAIRENTO, AL ;
KARONEN, SL .
ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 1981, 98 (04) :634-640
[2]  
BERRY WR, 1979, CANCER, V44, P763, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197908)44:2<763::AID-CNCR2820440251>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-5
[4]  
BIRKE G, 1905, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V109, P129
[5]  
BRADSHAW L. R. A., 1964, INVEST UROL, V1, P466
[6]  
Byar D, 1984, CONTROLLED CLIN TRIA, P147
[7]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LEUPROLIDE WITH AND WITHOUT FLUTAMIDE IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA [J].
CRAWFORD, ED ;
EISENBERGER, MA ;
MCLEOD, DG ;
SPAULDING, JT ;
BENSON, R ;
DORR, FA ;
BLUMENSTEIN, BA ;
DAVIS, MA ;
GOODMAN, PJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 321 (07) :419-424
[8]  
EISENBERGER M, 1989, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V8, P132
[9]  
EMRICH LJ, 1985, CANCER RES, V45, P5173
[10]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64