COEXISTENCE OF SUBADULT MALES AND FEMALES AS ALTERNATIVE TACTICS OF BREEDING POST ACQUISITION IN A MONOGAMOUS AND PROTANDROUS ANEMONEFISH

被引:10
作者
HATTORI, A
YAMAMURA, N
机构
[1] SAGA MED SCH, DEPT NAT SCI, SAGA 849, JAPAN
[2] OSAKA CITY UNIV, FAC SCI, DEPT BIOL, ANIM SOCIOL LAB, SUMIYOSHI KU, OSAKA 558, JAPAN
关键词
ANEMONEFISH; SEX CHANGE; ALTERNATIVE TACTICS; ESS MODEL; LIMITED BREEDING SITE; HOST DENSITY;
D O I
10.1007/BF01237775
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The monogamous and protandrous anemonefish, Amphiprion clarkii, utilizes only large host sea anemones as breeding sites. Under conditions of breeding site shortage, an important strategy for unmated fish may be to prepare themselves to enter quickly a breeding site from which a breeding male or female has recently disappeared. There are two types of subadults. Some juveniles become subadult males, which can change either to male or female afterwards, but others become subadult females, which can change only to female. Subadult females seem to acquire female posts more easily than subadult males. We develop an ESS model which evaluates the future reproductive success of subadult females and subadult males and test whether coexistence of subadult males and females can be interpreted as adaptive alternative tactics, using field data from two populations. The model predicts that if mortality does not differ between adult males and females the frequency for juveniles to become subadult females should be equal to the proportion of breeding post acquisition by subadult females among that by all subadults. The model also predicts that if mortality does not differ between subadult males and females, nor in adults, the frequency of subadult females among all subadults should be equal to the proportion of post acquisition. The model, with data from two study sites, suggests that alternative life-history pathways found in A. clarkii have evolved through adaptive tactics of breeding post acquisition.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 303
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ALDENHOVEN JM, 1986, AUST J MAR FRESH RES, V37, P353
[2]  
Allen GR, 1972, ANEMONEFISHES THEIR
[3]  
CHARNOV E L, 1982
[4]   SIZE ADVANTAGE MAY NOT ALWAYS FAVOR SEX-CHANGE [J].
CHARNOV, EL .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1986, 119 (03) :283-285
[5]   NATURAL-SELECTION AND SEX CHANGE IN PANDALID SHRIMP - TEST OF A LIFE-HISTORY THEORY [J].
CHARNOV, EL .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1979, 113 (05) :715-734
[6]  
Fisher RA., 1930, GENETICAL THEORY NAT, DOI 10.5962/bhl.title.27468
[7]   MONOGAMY AND SEX CHANGE BY AGGRESSIVE DOMINANCE IN CORAL-REEF FISH [J].
FRICKE, H ;
FRICKE, S .
NATURE, 1977, 266 (5605) :830-832
[8]  
FRICKE HW, 1979, Z TIERPSYCHOL, V50, P313
[9]   EVOLUTION OF HERMAPHRODITISM AMONG ANIMALS [J].
GHISELIN, MT .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1969, 44 (02) :189-+
[10]  
Gross M.T., 1984, P55