ERRORS IN PRESSURE-GRADIENT MEASUREMENT BY CONTINUOUS WAVE DOPPLER ULTRASOUND - TYPE, SIZE AND AGE EFFECTS IN BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVES

被引:27
作者
STEWART, SFC
NAST, EP
ARABIA, FA
TALBOT, TL
PROSCHAN, M
CLARK, RE
机构
[1] NHLBI,BIOSTAT BRANCH,BETHESDA,MD 20892
[2] NHLBI,CARDIAC SURG BRANCH,BETHESDA,MD 20892
[3] NIH,NATL CTR RES RESOURCES,BIOMED ENGN & INSTRUMENTAT PROGRAM,BETHESDA,MD 20892
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0735-1097(91)90801-F
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The accuracy of continuous wave Doppler ultrasound in deriving pressure gradients across bioprosthetic heart valves was evaluated in an in vitro pulse duplicator. Simultaneous pressure transducer and Doppler measurements were made in new and explanted aortic bioprosthetic valves of several sizes and four types: Carpentier-Edwards, Ionescu-Shiley, Hancock standard and Hancock modified. The mean and peak gradients calculated by the modified Bernoulli equation from Doppler velocity measurements were always greater than those measured manometrically, despite corrections for location dependence of the manometric gradient (or pressure recovery). The relation between manometric and ultrasonically determined gradient was found to be statistically dependent on the valve type (mean gradient p < 0.0001; peak gradient p = 0.0003) and size (mean gradient p = 0.0089; peak gradient p = 0.0107). Effects of implantation were observed, but were not shown to be significant. It is concluded that the continuous wave Doppler velocity data overestimated prosthetic valve pressure gradient in all cases, even when pressure recovery was taken into account. Clinicians should be wary of Doppler data when making major diagnostic or therapeutic decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 779
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ARABIA F A, 1989, Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology, V23, P205
[2]   DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN DOPPLER AND CATHETER GRADIENTS IN AORTIC PROSTHETIC VALVES INVITRO - A MANIFESTATION OF LOCALIZED GRADIENTS AND PRESSURE RECOVERY [J].
BAUMGARTNER, H ;
KHAN, S ;
DEROBERTIS, M ;
CZER, L ;
MAURER, G .
CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (04) :1467-1475
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   CONTINUOUS WAVE DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF PROSTHETIC VALVE GRADIENTS - A SIMULTANEOUS DOPPLER-CATHETER CORRELATIVE STUDY [J].
BURSTOW, DJ ;
NISHIMURA, RA ;
BAILEY, KR ;
REEDER, GS ;
HOLMES, DR ;
SEWARD, JB ;
TAJIK, AJ .
CIRCULATION, 1989, 80 (03) :504-514
[5]  
HATLE L, 1978, BRIT HEART J, V40, P131
[6]  
HATLE L, 1980, BRIT HEART J, V43, P284
[7]  
HATLE L, 1985, DOPPLER ULTRASOUND C, P22
[8]   DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IN AORTIC-STENOSIS - INVITRO STUDIES OF PRESSURE-GRADIENT DETERMINATION [J].
HOLEN, J ;
WAAG, RC ;
GRAMIAK, R .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1987, 13 (06) :321-328
[9]   PRESSURE RECOVERY DISTAL TO A STENOSIS - POTENTIAL CAUSE OF GRADIENT OVERESTIMATION BY DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY [J].
LEVINE, RA ;
JIMOH, A ;
CAPE, EG ;
MCMILLAN, S ;
YOGANATHAN, AP ;
WEYMAN, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 13 (03) :706-715