CHARACTERIZATION OF RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA (RAPD) PRODUCTS FROM XANTHOMONAS-CAMPESTRIS AND SOME COMMENTS ON THE USE OF RAPD PRODUCTS IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS

As part of our research to determine phylogenetic relationships of organisms within the phytobacterial species Xanthomonas campestris, we have examined the use of the random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique. The objective of this aspect of our research was to determine if a valid cladistic character analysis could be carried out by direct comparison of RAPD products separated on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. RAPD products were amplified from 47 Xanthomonas campestris DNA templates using a single oligonucleotide primer. These RAPD products were compared and variation was characterized by Southern analysis of both RAPD products and genomic DNA of the 47 bacterial strains using two cloned RAPD products as probes. Analysis of the data set revealed that the RAPD products were not necessarily homologous or independent, crucial prerequisites for characters to be analyzed in a cladistic phylogenetic analysis. It has been commonly assumed that RAPD variation occurs due to insertion/deletion events or alterations in the primer binding site. Within our data set, we demonstrate absence phenotypes arising from the apparent absence of corresponding loci and also due to the preferred synthesis of alternative RAPD products from unrelated loci. These different types of variation are a reflection of different types of genotypic variation, and direct examination of RAPD products did not allow us to distinguish by which mechanism a particular absence phenotype arose. Although this may not be important for phenetic analyses, for analyses of homologous characters using a cladistic approach it is critical. We also detected unrelated, co-migrating RAPD products and multiple related RAPD products within reaction mixtures. These could both contribute to errors in estimates of similarity, important in an phylogenetic analysis. All of these characteristics of RAPD products should be taken into consideration when RAPD products are used for phylogenetic comparisons. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.