RELEVANCE AND RATIONALITY IN LEISURE STUDIES - A PLEA FOR GOOD REASON

被引:11
作者
SYLVESTER, C
机构
[1] Department of Physical Education, Health and Recreation, Western Washington University, Bellingham, DC
关键词
LEISURE SCIENCE; PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE; SCIENCE AND VALUES;
D O I
10.1080/01490409509513249
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The issue of relevance cannot be separated from a concern for values. Yet convention in rational inquiry has rigidly segregated values (moral knowledge) from facts (empirical knowledge). At one time, moral and empirical knowledge coexisted, offering a theory of reason able to account for matters of moral relevance. Among other factors, instrumental rationality and positivism undermined the relationship of empirical science and moral philosophy. A reconciliation between facts and values, providing a more ''reasonable theory of reason'' better suited to moral relevance, is possible. It will require a more diverse and broader approach to inquiry that integratively includes empirical, interpretive, and critical methods. Several suggestions are presented for consideration by leisure studies researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 131
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Ayer A. J., 1971, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC
  • [2] Bernstein R.J., 1976, RESTRUCTURING SOCIAL
  • [3] Brubaker Rogers, 1984, LIMITS RATIONALITY
  • [4] THE COMING SEPARATION OF LEISURE STUDIES FROM PARKS AND RECREATION EDUCATION
    BURDGE, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 1985, 17 (02) : 133 - 141
  • [5] Carnap Rudolf., 1935, PHILOS LOGICAL SYNTA
  • [6] DOUGLAS WO, 1977, DOUGLAS OPINIONS, P231
  • [7] GOODALE T, 1991, RECREATION LEISURE I, P85
  • [8] Habermas J., 1971, KNOWLEDGE HUMAN INTE
  • [9] Jones Richard Foster, 1961, ANCIENTS MODERNS STU
  • [10] Maxwell N., 1984, KNOWLEDGE WISDOM REV