Audit is now part of any laboratory service. Histopathology is no exception, and we have set up a system which allows us to review 4% of our specimens. These specimens are identified using a random number generator and reviewed by a consultant pathologist. Both slides and wet specimens are reviewed and graded according to a set scheme. The results from the first year of operation (1990) show a high rate of accuracy with no serious diagnostic disagreements between the auditor and the reporting pathologist. However, some errors which we would wish to prevent were detected and the audit has allowed us to take corrective measures. In our opinion, this form of audit is useful and necessary to maintain good clinical practice. The cost is considerable - histopathology is by its nature labour intensive. Recognition of this fact by health boards is essential if such systems are to continue.