THE LIMITS TO GLOBALIZATION - TECHNOLOGY DISTRICTS AND INTERNATIONAL-TRADE

被引:280
作者
STORPER, M
机构
[1] Graduate School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Univ. of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles
关键词
INTERNATIONAL TRADE; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; INNOVATION; PRODUCTION NETWORKS; TECHNOLOGICAL LEARNING; AGGLOMERATION; REGION;
D O I
10.2307/144041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The proportion of traded goods in world output has been rising steadily over the past several decades. When we look at specific products exported by the advanced industrial nations, increasing export specialization is evident. Such specialization cannot be explained by conventional notions of comparative advantage, nor entirely by the new trade theory based on economies of scale. Rather, a significant proportion must be due to technological or "absolute" advantages on the part of the specialized exporter, and a significant dimension of technological advantage is product-based and renewed through learning, giving rise to dynamic economies of variety as a source of export specialization. Industries 'characterized by such product-based learning and absolute advantage tend to have important developmental effects on their host economies because they earn quasi-rents. Such industries also tend to be organized into production networks combining the advantages of specialization and flexibility, which are kev to technological learning. These export-oriented absolute advantage industries tend to be found in one or a few subnational regions of their host countries. In this way, the global economy may be thought of as consisting, in important part, of a series of "technology districts." Unlocking the organizational secrets of technological learning in these places is now a kev task for understanding the dynamics both of these localities and of the global economy as a whole. I give examples from studies in France, Italy, and the U.S.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 93
页数:34
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] AMENDOLA G, 1991, 18TH ANN C EUR ASS R
  • [2] AMENDOLA M, 1990, DYNAMIQUE EC INNOVAT
  • [3] Asanuma B., 1989, J JAPANESE INT EC, V3, P1, DOI [10.1016/0889-1583(89)90029-4, DOI 10.1016/0889-1583(89)90029-4]
  • [4] TRADE LIBERALISATION AND REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
    BALASSA, B
    [J]. MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 1965, 33 (02): : 99 - 123
  • [5] BECATTINI G, 1987, MERCATO FORZE LOCALE
  • [6] BEST M, 1990, NEW COMPETITION I IN
  • [7] Boltanski L., 1987, EC GRANDEUR
  • [8] CHANDLER A, 1966, STATEGY STRUCTURE CH
  • [9] The Nature of the Firm
    Coase, R. H.
    [J]. ECONOMICA-NEW SERIES, 1937, 4 (16): : 386 - 405
  • [10] COOKE P, 1991, AUG INT SEM UND CIT