SPHERE-SPECIFIC JUST WORLD BELIEFS AND ATTITUDES TO AIDS

被引:46
作者
FURNHAM, A
PROCTER, E
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1, 26 BE, dford Way
关键词
JUST WORLD BELIEFS; AIDS; SPHERE-SPECIFIC MEASURES;
D O I
10.1177/001872679204500303
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper is predicated on the idea that Just World Beliefs (JWB) are multidimensional. It is proposed that individual difference in JWB are divided into three components referring to different spheres of behavior: personal, interpersonal, and social political (Paulus, 1983). A questionnaire was specifically devised to assess these beliefs. There was some evidence of internal reliability. A construct validity study is reported to substantiate the use of the new instrument. It examined the relationship between JWB and the attitudes to AIDS. As predicted, JWB beliefs were closely related to five attitudinal factors concerning AIDS. Socio-political just world beliefs seemed most closely linked to attitudes to AIDS, though the size of the correlations suggests the relationship was not very substantial. The structure of JWB are discussed along with other relevant research on attitudes to AIDS.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 280
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   FACTOR ANALYTICAL AND CORRELATIONAL STUDY OF JUST WORLD SCALE [J].
AHMED, SMS ;
STEWART, RAC .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1985, 60 (01) :135-140
[2]  
ALDERMAN O, 1974, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V29, P342
[3]   AUTHORITARIANISM AND JUST WORLD BELIEFS [J].
CONNORS, J ;
HEAVEN, PCL .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 127 (03) :345-346
[4]  
Crano W.D., 1986, PRINCIPLES METHODS S
[5]  
Deutsch M., 1985, DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE
[6]  
ELLARD J, 1982, ANN M AM PSYCHOL ASS
[7]   CONTROL AND BELIEF IN THE JUST WORLD - WHATS GOOD ALSO CAN BE BAD [J].
FEINBERG, RA ;
POWELL, A ;
MILLER, FG .
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1982, 10 (01) :57-61
[8]  
FINK HC, 1976, APR E PSYCH ASS
[10]   JUST WORLD BELIEFS AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE POOR [J].
FURNHAM, A ;
GUNTER, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 23 (SEP) :265-269