DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF PARACLINICAL TESTS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - RELATIVE SENSITIVITIES AND SPECIFICITIES FOR RECLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO THE POSER COMMITTEE CRITERIA

被引:71
作者
BEER, S [1 ]
ROSLER, KM [1 ]
HESS, CW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BERN,INSELSPITAL,DEPT NEUROL,CH-3010 BERN,SWITZERLAND
关键词
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; MAGNETIC BRAIN STIMULATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
D O I
10.1136/jnnp.59.2.152
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The yield of paraclinical tests was evaluated in a prospective study of 189 consecutive patients referred for suspected multiple sclerosis (142 patients with multiple sclerosis, 47 non-multiple sclerosis patients on discharge), Patients were first classified according to the Poser criteria by the clinical findings. Subsequently, the results of paraclinical tests (cranial MRI, visually evoked potentials (VEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials by tibial nerve stimulation (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and analysis of CSF for oligoclonal banding and IgG-index (CSF)) were taken into account, The percentage of reclassified patients (reclassification sensitivity, RS) was always lower than the percentage of abnormal results (diagnostic sensitivity, DS), and the divergence of RS v DS differed between the tests (60% v 84% in MRT, 31% v 77% in CSF, 29% v 37% in VEPs, 20% v 68% in MEPs, and 12% v 46% in SSEPs respectively), False reclassifications of non-multiple sclerosis patients to multiple sclerosis would have occurred with all tests (MRI: six of 47 patients, (reclassification specificity 88%); CSF: one (98%); VEPs: two (96%); MEPs: two (96%); SSEPs: four (91%); P < 0.05). Although MRI had superior diagnostic capacity, 57 of the 142 patients with multiple sclerosis were not reclassified by the MRI result, 12 of whom were reclassified by CSF and 18 by one of the evoked potential (EP) studies. Of the 98 patients not reclassified by CSF, 53 were reclassified by MRI and 39 by EPs. The results suggest that for tbe evaluation of paraclinical tests in suspected multiple sclerosis, comparison of diagnostic sensitivities is inappropriate. In general, a cranial MRI contributes most to the diagnosis; however, due to its comparatively low specificity and its considerable number of negative results, EP or CSF studies are often useful, to establish the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 159
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] QUANTITATIVE MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS PLAQUE ASSESSMENT WITH MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING - ITS CORRELATION WITH CLINICAL-PARAMETERS, EVOKED-POTENTIALS, AND INTRA-BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER IGG SYNTHESIS
    BAUMHEFNER, RW
    TOURTELLOTTE, WW
    SYNDULKO, K
    WALUCH, V
    ELLISON, GW
    MEYERS, LW
    COHEN, SN
    OSBORNE, M
    SHAPSHAK, P
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1990, 47 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [2] PATTERN SHIFT VISUAL, BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY, AND SHORT-LATENCY SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    CHIAPPA, KH
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1980, 30 (07) : 110 - 123
  • [3] CORRELATION BETWEEN MULTIMODAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    COMI, G
    MARTINELLI, V
    MEDAGLINI, S
    LOCATELLI, T
    FILIPPI, M
    CANAL, N
    TRIULZI, F
    DELMASCHIO, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 1989, 236 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [4] EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS BY EVOKED-POTENTIALS AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    CUTLER, JR
    AMINOFF, MJ
    BRANTZAWADZKI, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1986, 20 (05) : 645 - 648
  • [5] CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
    EISEN, AA
    SHTYBEL, W
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 1990, 13 (11) : 995 - 1011
  • [6] MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, EVOKED-RESPONSES, AND SPINAL-FLUID ELECTROPHORESIS
    FARLOW, MR
    MARKAND, ON
    EDWARDS, MK
    STEVENS, JC
    KOLAR, OJ
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1986, 36 (06) : 828 - 831
  • [7] CRITERIA FOR AN INCREASED SPECIFICITY OF MRI INTERPRETATION IN ELDERLY SUBJECTS WITH SUSPECTED MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    FAZEKAS, F
    OFFENBACHER, H
    FUCHS, S
    SCHMIDT, R
    NIEDERKORN, K
    HORNER, S
    LECHNER, H
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1988, 38 (12) : 1822 - 1825
  • [8] FILIPPINI G, 1994, J NEUROL, V241, P132
  • [9] CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - THE IMPACT OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND ANCILLARY TESTING
    GIANG, DW
    GROW, VM
    MOONEY, C
    MUSHLIN, AI
    GOODMAN, AD
    MATTSON, DH
    SCHIFFER, RB
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1994, 51 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [10] TRIMODAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS COMPARED WITH MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    GIESSER, BS
    KURTZBERG, D
    VAUGHAN, HG
    AREZZO, JC
    AISEN, ML
    SMITH, CR
    LAROCCA, NG
    SCHEINBERG, LC
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1987, 44 (03) : 281 - 284