A POPULATION-BASED EVALUATION OF GLAUCOMA SCREENING - THE BALTIMORE EYE SURVEY

被引:343
作者
TIELSCH, JM
KATZ, J
SINGH, K
QUIGLEY, HA
GOTTSCH, JD
JAVITT, J
SOMMER, A
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,SCH PUBL HLTH,WILMER EYE INST,DANA CTR PREVENT OPHTHALMOL,BALTIMORE,MD 21218
[2] UNIV MIAMI,SCH MED,BASCOM PALMER EYE INST,GLAUCOMA SERV,MIAMI,FL 33152
[3] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,SCH MED,WILMER EYE INST,CORNEA SERV,BALTIMORE,MD 21205
[4] GEORGETOWN UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT OPHTHALMOL,WASHINGTON,DC 20057
[5] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,SCH HYG & PUBL HLTH,OFF DEAN,BALTIMORE,MD 21218
关键词
GLAUCOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The Baltimore Eye Survey was a population-based survey conducted from January 1985 to November 1988 among residents of east Baltimore, Maryland, who were 40 years of age or older. A total of 5,308 black subjects and white subjects received a comprehensive screening examination for glaucoma including tonometry, visual fields, stereoscopic fundus photography, and a detailed medical and ophthalmic history. Based on a definitive examination, a diagnosis of glaucoma of any type was made for 196 persons. Tonometry, cup:disc ratio, and narrowest neuroretinal rim width were evaluated for their ability to correctly classify subjects into diseased or nondiseased states. There were no cutoff values at which these variables provided a reasonable balance of sensitivity and specificity, separately or in combination. Logistic regression models were fit that included demographic and other risk factors. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for varying cutoff levels on the distribution of predicted probabilities. There was no cutoff for which reasonable sensitivity and specificity were obtained. The authors conclude that the effectiveness of current techniques for glaucoma screening is limited.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1110
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
AIRAKSINEN PJ, 1984, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V98, P566, DOI 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90242-3
[2]   BEDFORD GLAUCOMA SURVEY [J].
BANKES, JLK ;
PERKINS, ES ;
TSOLAKIS, S ;
WRIGHT, JE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1968, 1 (5595) :791-&
[3]   MASS SCREENING FOR GLAUCOMA [J].
BRAV, SS ;
KIRBER, HP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1951, 147 (12) :1127-1128
[4]   THE VALUE OF SCREENING FOR GLAUCOMA WITH TONOMETRY [J].
EDDY, DM ;
SANDERS, LE ;
EDDY, JF .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1983, 28 (03) :194-205
[5]   GLAUCOMA DETECTION IN FLORIDA - ANALYSIS OF 67193 PERSONS EXAMINED [J].
FRYDMAN, JE ;
CLOWER, JW ;
FULGHUM, JE ;
HESTER, MW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1966, 198 (12) :1237-&
[6]  
GARNER LL, 1961, SIGHT SAVING REV, V31, P41
[7]   SCREENING FOR GLAUCOMA [J].
HITCHINGS, RA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 292 (6519) :505-506
[8]   INTRA-OCULAR PRESSURE GLAUCOMA AND GLAUCOMA SUSPECTS IN A DEFINED POPULATION [J].
HOLLOWS, FC ;
GRAHAM, PA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1966, 50 (10) :570-&
[9]   STANDARDIZING DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES [J].
KAHN, HA ;
LEIBOWITZ, H ;
GANLEY, JP ;
KINI, M ;
COLTON, T ;
NICKERSON, R ;
DAWBER, TR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1975, 79 (05) :768-775
[10]  
KAHN HA, 1973, DHEW NIH73427 NAT EY