IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUED TESTICULAR SUPPRESSION IN HORMONE-REFRACTORY PROSTATE-CANCER

被引:142
作者
TAYLOR, CD
ELSON, P
TRUMP, DL
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV, SCH MED, DANA FARBER CANC INST, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[2] UNIV WISCONSIN, CTR COMPREHENS CANC, MADISON, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2167
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Patients in whom prostate cancer progresses despite testicular androgen ablation are generally said to have cancers that have become resistant to hormonal maneuvers. If androgen suppression has been pharmacologic, this therapy is often stopped before consideration of other systemic treatments. This exploratory study sought clinical correlates of experimental evidence that there may be substantial acceleration of tumor growth after cessation of androgen suppression. Materials and Methods: A retrospective multivariate analysis was performed on survival data for 341 patients treated on four clinical trials of secondary therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Factors included in the model were recent weight loss, age, performance status, disease site (soft tissue v bone-dominant), prior radiotherapy, and continued androgen suppression v discontinued exogenous endocrine therapy. Results: Recent weight loss, age, performance status, and disease site were important prognostic factors for survival duration in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Correcting for these factors, continued testicular androgen suppression was also an important predictor of survival duration in all data sets examined. Conclusion: This retrospective study showed a modest advantage in survival duration for men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer who continued to receive testicular androgen suppression. The hypothesis that continued hormonal maneuvers can still affect survival in this group warrants examination in prospective trials.
引用
收藏
页码:2167 / 2172
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
BLOCK M, 1984, CANCER TREAT REP, V68, P719
[2]  
Byar D P, 1988, NCI Monogr, P165
[3]   COMPARISON OF TESTOSTERONE AND LH VALUES IN SUBCAPSULAR VS TOTAL ORCHIECTOMY PATIENTS [J].
CHAPMAN, JP .
UROLOGY, 1987, 30 (01) :27-28
[4]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[5]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LEUPROLIDE WITH AND WITHOUT FLUTAMIDE IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA [J].
CRAWFORD, ED ;
EISENBERGER, MA ;
MCLEOD, DG ;
SPAULDING, JT ;
BENSON, R ;
DORR, FA ;
BLUMENSTEIN, BA ;
DAVIS, MA ;
GOODMAN, PJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 321 (07) :419-424
[6]   EVIDENCE FOR TESTICULAR IMPAIRMENT AFTER LONG-TERM TREATMENT WITH A LUTEINIZING-HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST IN ELDERLY MEN [J].
DECENSI, AU ;
GUARNERI, D ;
MARRONI, P ;
DICRISTINA, L ;
PAGANUZZI, M ;
BOCCARDO, F .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (05) :1235-1238
[7]   COMPARISON OF FLUTAMIDE AND EMCYT IN HORMONE-REFRACTORY METASTATIC PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
DEKERNION, JN ;
MURPHY, GP ;
PRIORE, R .
UROLOGY, 1988, 31 (04) :312-317
[8]   A COMPARATIVE CLINICAL-TRIAL OF ADRIAMYCIN AND 5-FLUOROURACIL IN ADVANCED PROSTATIC-CANCER - PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND RESPONSE [J].
DEWYS, WD ;
BEGG, CB ;
BRODOVSKY, H ;
CREECH, R ;
KHANDEKAR, J .
PROSTATE, 1983, 4 (01) :1-11
[9]  
Eisenberger M A, 1987, Oncology (Williston Park), V1, P59
[10]  
EMRICH LJ, 1985, CANCER RES, V45, P5173