TESTING FOR VALIDITY AND BIAS IN THE USE OF GPA AND THE MCAT IN THE SELECTION OF MEDICAL-SCHOOL STUDENTS

被引:18
作者
VANCOUVER, JB
REINHART, MA
SOLOMON, DJ
HAF, JJ
机构
[1] AMER BOARD EMERGENCY MED,EVALUAT & RES,E LANSING,MI
[2] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV,OFF MED EDUC RES & DEV,E LANSING,MI 48824
[3] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV,COLL HUMAN MED,E LANSING,MI 48824
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00001888-199011000-00012
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In the 1988 study reported here, Medical College Admissions test (MCAT) scores and grade point averages for undergraduate science courses (S-GPAs) were examined for predictive validity and differential prediction of National Board of Medical Examiners Part I scores. Data from 579 medical students from the classes of 1979-80 through 1983-84 attending a midwestern medical college were analyzed via moderated multiple regression. The findings indicated that using the S-GPA and a composite MCAT score based on the Biology Knowledge, Chemistry Knowledge, Physics Knowledge, Science Problems, and Reading subtests was valid and equally predictive for the minority and majority groups studied. These results are discussed in terms of past findings on cognitive tests in general, and the MCAT and the S-GPA specifically. © 1990 Association of American Medical Colleges.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 697
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   TESTING FOR FAIRNESS WITH A MODERATED MULTIPLE-REGRESSION STRATEGY - ALTERNATIVE TO DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS [J].
BARTLETT, CJ ;
BOBKO, P ;
MOSIER, SB ;
HANNAN, R .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 31 (02) :233-241
[2]  
COHEN S, 1977, STATISTICAL POWER AN
[3]  
HULIN CL, 1985, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
[4]   DIFFERENTIAL VALIDITY OF EMPLOYMENT TESTS BY RACE - A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW AND ANALYSIS [J].
HUNTER, JE ;
SCHMIDT, FL ;
HUNTER, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (04) :721-735
[5]  
HUNTER JE, 1979, 20 MICH STAT U I RES
[6]  
JONES RF, 1986, MAR M AM ED RES ASS
[7]  
MITCHELL KJ, 1987, J MED EDUC, V62, P871
[8]  
SOLOMON DJ, 1989, JAN WINT C MICH ED R
[9]  
Stone-Romero E. F., 1988, RES PERSONNEL HUMAN, V6, P191
[10]   COMPARISON OF JOINT MODERATORS IN THREE PREDICTION TECHNIQUES [J].
ZEDECK, S ;
CRANNY, CJ ;
VALE, CA ;
SMITH, PC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 55 (03) :234-&