DOES ATTENTION HAVE DIFFERENT EFFECTS ON LINE ORIENTATION AND LINE ARRANGEMENT DISCRIMINATION

被引:55
作者
CHEAL, ML
LYON, DR
HUBBARD, DC
机构
[1] University of Dayton Research Institute, Higley, AZ
来源
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY | 1991年 / 43卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14640749108400959
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Visual search and texture segregation studies have led to the inference that stimuli differing in the orientation of their component line segments can be distinguished without focal attention, whereas stimuli that differ only in the arrangement of line segments cannot. In most of this research, the locus of attention has not been explicitly manipulated. In the first experiment presented here, attention was directed to a relevant peripheral target by a cue presented near the target location or at the fovea. Effects of attention on orientation discrimination were assessed in a two-alternative forced-choice task with targets that were either: (1) lines that slanted obliquely to the right or left, or were horizontal or vertical, or (2) Y-like targets that had a short arm leading obliquely right or left of a vertical line. In some groups, a four-alternative forced-choice test with lines at 0-degrees, 45-degrees, 90-degrees, and 135-degrees orientations was used. Discrimination of these targets (i.e. targets that differ in the orientation of component line segments) was only minimally facilitated as the time between the onset of the valid cue and the onset of the target (cue-target stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA) was increased from 0 or 17 msec to 267 msec. In contrast, discrimination of targets that did not differ in the orientation of component line segments but differed in line arrangement (T-like characters), was greatly facilitated by longer cue-target SOAs. In Experiment 2, a cue misdirected attention on 20% of the trials. A decrement occurred on incorrectly cued trials in comparison to correctly cued trials for both types of stimuli used (lines and Ts). The results from these experiments suggest that discrimination of line orientation benefits less from focal attention than does discrimination of line arrangement, but that both discriminations suffer when attention must be disengaged from an irrelevant spatial location.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 857
页数:33
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   INFLUENCE OF SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN PERIPHERAL AND FOVEAL VISION [J].
AMBLER, BA ;
FINKLEA, DL .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1976, 19 (06) :518-524
[2]   ECCENTRIC VISION - ADVERSE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN LINE SEGMENTS [J].
ANDRIESSEN, JJ ;
BOUMA, H .
VISION RESEARCH, 1976, 16 (01) :71-78
[3]   ENHANCEMENT OF PERCEPTUAL SENSITIVITY AS THE RESULT OF SELECTIVELY ATTENDING TO SPATIAL LOCATIONS [J].
BASHINSKI, HS ;
BACHARACH, VR .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 28 (03) :241-248
[4]   EFFECTS OF CONCENTRATED AND DISTRIBUTED ATTENTION ON PERIPHERAL ACUITY [J].
BECK, J ;
AMBLER, B .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1973, 14 (02) :225-230
[5]   DISCRIMINABILITY OF DIFFERENCES IN LINE SLOPE AND IN LINE ARRANGEMENT AS A FUNCTION OF MASK DELAY [J].
BECK, J ;
AMBLER, B .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1972, 12 (1A) :33-&
[6]  
BECK J, 1982, ORG REPRESENTATION P, P285
[7]   PARALLEL VERSUS SERIAL PROCESSING IN RAPID PATTERN-DISCRIMINATION [J].
BERGEN, JR ;
JULESZ, B .
NATURE, 1983, 303 (5919) :696-698
[8]  
BRAUN J, 1989, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, V30, P456
[9]   HAS FEATURE INTEGRATION-THEORY COME UNGLUED - A REPLY [J].
BRIAND, KA ;
KLEIN, RM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1989, 15 (02) :401-406
[10]   IS POSNER BEAM THE SAME AS TREISMAN GLUE - ON THE RELATION BETWEEN VISUAL ORIENTING AND FEATURE INTEGRATION-THEORY [J].
BRIAND, KA ;
KLEIN, RM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1987, 13 (02) :228-241