DEFIBRILLATION ENERGY-REQUIREMENTS DURING MORICIZINE AND MORICIZINE LIDOCAINE THERAPY

被引:19
作者
UJHELYI, MR
ORANGERS, EA
KLUGER, J
FAN, C
CHOW, M
机构
[1] HARTFORD HOSP,DEPT PHARM SERV,HARTFORD,CT 06115
[2] UNIV CONNECTICUT,COLL PHARM,STORRS,CT 06268
[3] UNIV CONNECTICUT,COLL MED,STORRS,CT 06268
[4] HARTFORD HOSP,DEPT CARDIOL,HARTFORD,CT 06115
关键词
MORICIZINE; LIDOCAINE; DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD; ANTIARRHYTHMIC AGENTS;
D O I
10.1097/00005344-199212000-00013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Defibrillation energy requirements may be altered by antiarrhythmic agents. We investigated the effects of moricizine on the defibrillation threshold (DFT) in 18 pentobarbital-anesthetized pigs. The animals were randomized, in a blinded fashion, to moricizine or control (0.9% saline) treatment groups. Each group underwent three treatment phases: baseline, drug infusion (moricizine or saline), and drug infusion combined with lidocaine. Moricizine (2 mg/kg loading dose, 1.5 mg/kg/h infusion) and lidocaine (5 mg/kg loading dose, 4 mg/kg/h infusion) were dosed to achieve therapeutic concentrations. After 5 s of induced ventricular fibrillation, defibrillation was performed using a cardiac defibrillator interfaced with two epicardial electrode patches. DFTs were determined at baseline, during the drug phase, and during the combination of lidocaine with moricizine or saline. DFT values in the animals randomized to the control group were 15.2 +/- 4.2, 14.0 +/- 3.3, and 17.8 +/- 8.7 J at baseline, saline infusion, and saline combined with lidocaine, respectively. No significant differences were observed among the treatment phases. DFT values in the animals randomized to moricizine group were 12.1 +/- 2.8, 13.8 +/- 5.2, and 22.9 +/- 7.1 J at baseline, moricizine infusion, and moricizine combined with lidocaine, respectively. The DFT values during the lidocaine-moricizine combination treatment phase were significantly greater than baseline and moricizine alone (p < 0.002). The mean change in the DFT from baseline to moricizine (14% increase) was significantly different than the mean change in the DFT from baseline to saline (8% decrease) (p = 0.03). Lidocaine added to moricizine increased the DFT by 84%, which was significantly different from the 27% increase in the DFT when lidocaine was added to saline (p = 0.02). We conclude that moricizine minimally increases the DFT, but the combination of moricizine with lidocaine results in a synergistic rise in the DFT that may have detrimental clinical implications.
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 939
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   ELECTRO-PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MYOCARDIAL INJURY INDUCED BY DEFIBRILLATORY SHOCKS ON DOGS [J].
ANDERSON, GJ ;
REISER, J ;
MCALLISTER, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1980, 45 (02) :446-446
[3]   ELEVATION OF VENTRICULAR DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD IN DOGS BY ANTI-ARRHYTHMIC DRUGS [J].
BABBS, CF ;
YIM, GKW ;
WHISTLER, SJ ;
TACKER, WA ;
GEDDES, LA .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1979, 98 (03) :345-350
[4]   THE AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR - CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE, COMPLICATIONS, AND FOLLOW-UP IN 25 PATIENTS [J].
BORBOLA, J ;
DENES, P ;
EZRI, MD ;
HAUSER, RG ;
SERRY, C ;
GOLDIN, MD .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 148 (01) :70-76
[5]   COMPARISON OF ACTIVATION DURING VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION AND FOLLOWING UNSUCCESSFUL DEFIBRILLATION SHOCKS IN OPEN-CHEST DOGS [J].
CHEN, PS ;
WOLF, PD ;
MELNICK, SD ;
DANIELEY, ND ;
SMITH, WM ;
IDEKER, RE .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1990, 66 (06) :1544-1560
[6]   ANTIFIBRILLATORY EFFECTS OF LIDOCAINE AND BRETYLIUM IMMEDIATELY POSTCARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION [J].
CHOW, MSS ;
KLUGER, J ;
DIPERSIO, DM ;
LAWRENCE, R ;
FIELDMAN, A .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1985, 110 (05) :938-943
[7]  
CHOW MSS, 1986, P SOC EXP BIOL MED, V182, P63
[8]   A MODEL TO EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD DETERMINATION [J].
CHURCH, T ;
MARTINSON, M ;
KALLOK, M ;
WATSON, W .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 11 (11) :2002-2007
[9]   ACCEPTED, CONTROVERSIAL, AND SPECULATIVE ASPECTS OF VENTRICULAR DEFIBRILLATION [J].
CRAMPTON, R .
PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 1980, 23 (03) :167-186
[10]   RESPONSE OF RELATIVELY REFRACTORY CANINE MYOCARDIUM TO MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS [J].
DAUBERT, JP ;
FRAZIER, DW ;
WOLF, PD ;
FRANZ, MR ;
SMITH, WM ;
IDEKER, RE .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 84 (06) :2522-2538