TRAINING GENERALIST PHYSICIANS - STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE CURRICULUM

被引:16
作者
BURKE, W
BARON, RB
LEMON, M
LOSH, D
NOVACK, A
机构
[1] Department of Medicine RG-21, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, WA
[2] the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
[3] the Department of Medicine, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
[4] Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
[5] Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
关键词
CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; GENERALISTS; TRAINING;
D O I
10.1007/BF02598115
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To train more generalist physicians, structural changes must be made along the continuum of medical education. Future generalists require in-depth exposure to primary care practice, with substantive experience in the longitudinal management of patient panels and the opportunity to work with successful generalist role models. Clinical training and course work must incorporate a wide range of skills and disciplines, including areas now under-emphasized, such as epidemiology, health services, and psychosocial medicine. Recommendations for structural changes to increase the generalist focus of medical education include: 1) the development within institutions of central authorities, involving departments of internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics, in joint efforts to foster all aspects of generalist training, including recruitment curriculum development, community linkages, innovative approaches to training, and recognition and support for successful generalist teachers; 2) commitment of a minimum of 50% of clinical training to ambulatory care settings at both medical school and residency levels; 3) required longitudinal care experiences for all medical students and a 20% or greater time commitment to longitudinal care for internal medicine, pediatrics, and family medicine. residents; and 4) increased numbers of generalist faculty and enhanced teaching skills among faculty in the outpatient environment, to guarantee increased exposure of medical students and residents to generalist role models.
引用
收藏
页码:S23 / S30
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
King L.S., Medical education VI. The AMA surveys the problems, JAMA, 248, pp. 3017-21, (1982)
[2]  
Reuben D.B., McCue J.D., Gerbert B., The residency-practice training mismatch: a primary care education dilemma, Arch Intern Med, 148, pp. 914-9, (1988)
[3]  
Academic medicine and health care reform: graduate medical education, Acad Med, 68, pp. 717-24, (1993)
[4]  
Eisenberg J.M., Financing ambulatory care education in internal medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 5, pp. S70-S80, (1990)
[5]  
Wartman S.A., O'Sullivan P.S., Cyr M.G., Ambulatory-based residency education: improving the congruence of teaching, learning, and patient care, Ann Intern Med, 116, pp. 1071-5, (1992)
[6]  
Rivo M.L., Internal medicine and the journey to medical generalism, Ann Intern Med, 119, pp. 146-52, (1993)
[7]  
AAMC policy on the generalist physician, Acad Med, 68, pp. 1-6, (1993)
[8]  
General internal medicine and general internists: recognizing a national need, Ann Intern Med, 117, pp. 778-9, (1992)
[9]  
Noble J., Freidman R.H., Starfield B., Ash A., Black C., Career differences between primary care and traditional trainees in internal medicine and pediatrics, Ann Intern Med, 116, pp. 482-7, (1992)
[10]  
Burke W., Inui T., Do we still need primary care tracks?, Ann Intern Med, 116, pp. 1065-70, (1992)