CONTINUOUS COMPARED WITH INTERMITTENT TUBE-FEEDING IN THE ELDERLY

被引:64
作者
CIOCON, JO
GALINDOCIOCON, DJ
TIESSEN, C
GALINDO, D
机构
[1] UNIV NEBRASKA,MED CTR,OMAHA,NE 68105
[2] UNIV MIAMI,MIAMI,FL 33152
[3] VET ADM MED CTR,OMAHA,NE 68105
[4] VET ADM MED CTR,MIAMI,FL 33125
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0148607192016006525
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
The methods of continuous (C) and intermittent (1) nasogastric tube feedings in 60 patients, 54 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 72 +/- 9 years were compared in terms of number of complications, staff time used, and caloric intake. Patients were randomly assigned between these two methods and followed for 7 days. Diarrhea, aspiration pneumonia, clogged tubes, and self-extubation were observed in both groups. Diarrhea was significantly more frequent (96% of 30 patients) in the I group than the C group (66% of 30 patients) (p < .008). Furthermore, diarrhea was more prolonged (4 days or more) in 64% of 30 patients in the I group than the C group (4 days or more) in 58% of 30 patients (p < .02). However, clogged tubes occurred 3 times more often in the C group (p < .01). Self-extubation and aspiration pneumonia tend to be more frequent in the I group but the difference was not significant. The average time used by staff nurses in the maintenance of NGT feedings was not significantly longer in the I group (48.45 +/- 11 min/patient per day) than the C group (46.46 +/- 11 min/patient per day). In the C group the mean calories recommended were 2248 +/- 36 kcal/day but the actual caloric intake was only 1465 +/- 281 kcal/day, a deficiency of 783 +/- 291 kcal/day. The recommended calorie count for the I group was 2021 +/- 5 kcal/day but the amount delivered was only 1226 +/- 254 kcal/day, which resulted in a deficit of 795 +/- 259 kcal/day. This difference in calories recommended and actually delivered in the C and I groups was not significant.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 528
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BIVINS B, 1980, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V175, P70
[2]  
BREACH CL, 1988, NUTR SUPP SERV, V8, P28
[3]  
CIOCON J O, 1990, Dysphagia, V5, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF02407387
[4]   TUBE FEEDINGS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS - INDICATIONS, BENEFITS, AND COMPLICATIONS [J].
CIOCON, JO ;
SILVERSTONE, FA ;
GRAVER, LM ;
FOLEY, CJ .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 148 (02) :429-433
[5]   ASPIRATION AFTER PERCUTANEOUS GASTROSTOMY - ASSESSMENT BY TC-99M LABELING OF THE ENTERAL FEED [J].
COLE, MJ ;
SMITH, JT ;
MOLNAR, C ;
SHAFFER, EA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1987, 9 (01) :90-95
[6]  
DOBBIE R P, 1976, Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics, V143, P273
[7]  
HAYNESJOHNSON V, 1986, NUTR SUPPORT SERV, V6, P24
[8]  
HAYNESJOHNSON V, 1986, NUTR SUPP SERV, V6, P17
[9]   RATE AND VOLUME OF INTERMITTENT ENTERAL FEEDING [J].
HEITKEMPER, ME ;
MARTIN, DL ;
HANSEN, BC ;
HANSON, R ;
VANDERBURG, E .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1981, 5 (02) :125-129
[10]   COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS VS INTERMITTENT TUBE FEEDINGS IN ADULT BURN PATIENTS [J].
HIEBERT, JM ;
BROWN, A ;
ANDERSON, RG ;
HALFACRE, S ;
RODEHEAVER, GT ;
EDLICH, RF .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1981, 5 (01) :73-75