CERVICAL-CARCINOMA - DETERMINATION OF RECURRENT TURNER EXTENT VERSUS RADIATION CHANGES WITH MR-IMAGING

被引:41
作者
WEBER, TM
SOSTMAN, HD
SPRITZER, CE
BALLARD, RL
MEYER, GA
CLARKEPEARSON, DL
SOPER, JT
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,DURHAM,NC
[2] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,DURHAM,NC
关键词
MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR); TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; PELVIC ORGANS; MR; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997540
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for assessment of the presence and extent of tumor recurrence as determined with pathologic and surgical findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR findings were retrospectively examined in 37 patients with a history of cervical carcinoma. Inter- and intraobserver variability was analyzed. Surgical or pathologic results were acquired in 34 of these patients; the remaining three patients were clinically followed up for at least 4 years. RESULTS: MR imaging allowed correct detection of recurrent tumor in 18 of 21 patients who had histologically documented recurrence. It helped correctly exclude recurrent disease in 15 of 16 patients. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of recurrence was 86% and 94%, respectively. Good intra- and interobserver agreement was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: MR imaging is a useful modality for differentiation of recurrent cervical carcinoma from radiation changes, Determination of the extent of recurrence with MR imaging may offer clinical assistance in the selection of optimal therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 139
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
CASAMASSIMA F, 1989, BLOOD, V73, P1677
[2]   TUMOR RECURRENCE VERSUS FIBROSIS IN THE FEMALE PELVIS - DIFFERENTIATION WITH MR IMAGING AT 1.5-T [J].
EBNER, F ;
KRESSEL, HY ;
MINTZ, MC ;
CARLSON, JA ;
COHEN, EK ;
SCHIEBLER, M ;
GEFTER, W ;
AXEL, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (02) :333-340
[3]  
Efron B, 1982, JACKKNIFE BOOTSTRAP, DOI 10.1137/1.9781611970319
[4]   THE VALUE OF MRI IN EVALUATING PERIRECTAL AND PELVIC DISEASE [J].
FISHMANJAVITT, MC ;
LOVECCHIO, JL ;
JAVORS, B ;
NAIDICH, JB ;
MCKINLEY, M ;
STEIN, HL .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1987, 5 (05) :371-380
[5]  
FLEISS JL, 1973, STATISTICAL METHODS
[6]   RADIATION FIBROSIS - DIFFERENTIATION FROM RECURRENT TUMOR BY MR IMAGING - WORK IN PROGRESS [J].
GLAZER, HS ;
LEE, JKT ;
LEVITT, RG ;
HEIKEN, JP ;
LING, D ;
TOTTY, WG ;
BALFE, DM ;
EMANI, B ;
WASSERMAN, TH ;
MURPHY, WA .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (03) :721-726
[7]   FAT SUPPRESSION BY SECTION-SELECT GRADIENT REVERSAL ON SPIN-ECHO MR IMAGING - WORK IN PROGRESS [J].
GOMORI, JM ;
HOLLAND, GA ;
GROSSMAN, RI ;
GEFTER, WB ;
LENKINSKI, RE .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (02) :493-495
[8]   CRITICAL-POINTS OF FAILURE IN THERAPY OF CANCER OF CERVIX - REAPPRAISAL [J].
HALPIN, TF ;
FRICK, HC ;
MUNNELL, EW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1972, 114 (06) :755-+
[9]   THE VALUE OF CT IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF RECURRENT CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX [J].
HERON, CW ;
HUSBAND, JE ;
WILLIAMS, MP ;
DOBBS, HJ ;
COSGROVE, DO .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1988, 39 (05) :496-501
[10]   RADIOTHERAPY ALONE IN CARCINOMA OF THE INTACT UTERINE CERVIX ACCORDING TO FLETCHER,G.H. GUIDELINES - A FRENCH COOPERATIVE STUDY OF 1383 CASES [J].
HORIOT, JC ;
PIGNEUX, J ;
POURQUIER, H ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
ACHILLE, E ;
KEILING, R ;
COMBES, P ;
ROZAN, R ;
VROUSOS, C ;
DALY, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1988, 14 (04) :605-611