RIGOR IN FEMINIST RESEARCH

被引：222

作者：

HALL, JM

STEVENS, PE

机构：

[1] School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco

来源：

ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE | 1991年 / 13卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1097/00012272-199103000-00005

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Verifying the scientific adequacy of feminist studies is necessary to assure that research processes and outcomes are well grounded, cogent, justifiable, and relevant. The authors analyze what scientific adequacy means in feminist inquiry and propose standards of rigor by which nurse investigators can plan and evaluate their studies. In the process, conventional empiricist criteria of reliability and validity are critiqued, and more appropriate concepts representing dimensions of adequacy in feminist research are presented.

引用

页码：16 / 29

页数：14

共 78 条

[1] OBJECTIVITY AND TRUTH - PROBLEMS IN DOING FEMINIST RESEARCH [J].

ACKER, J ;

BARRY, K ;

ESSEVELD, J .

WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 1983, 6 (04) :423-435

[2] INTERPRETING DISCOURSE - COHERENCE AND THE ANALYSIS OF ETHNOGRAPHIC INTERVIEWS [J].

AGAR, M ;

HOBBS, JR .

DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1982, 5 (01) :1-32

[3]

Agar M.H., 1996, PROFESSIONAL STRANGE, V2

[4]

Ammon-Gaberson K B, 1988, Image J Nurs Sch, V20, P159

[5]

Baumgart A J, 1985, Health Care Women Int, V6, P267

[6]

BECKER HS, 1978, SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS

[7]

BENNER P, 1985, ADV NURS SCI, V8, P1

[8]

BLOOR MJ, 1983, CONT FIELD RES COLLE

[9]

Briggs CharlesL., 1986, STUDIES SOCIAL CULTU, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139165990

[10] WOMEN, HOUSEHOLD AND HEALTH IN LATIN-AMERICA [J].

BROWNER, CH .

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1989, 28 (05) :461-473

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →