COMPARISON OF DEXAMETHASONE AND ONDANSETRON IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF EMESIS INDUCED BY MODERATELY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY

被引:186
作者
JONES, AL
HILL, AS
SOUKOP, M
HUTCHEON, AW
CASSIDY, J
KAYE, SB
SIKORA, K
CARNEY, DN
CUNNINGHAM, D
机构
[1] INST CANC RES,MED SECT,SUTTON SM2 5PT,SURREY,ENGLAND
[2] BEATSON ONCOL CTR,GLASGOW,SCOTLAND
[3] MATER HOSP,DEPT MED ONCOL,DUBLIN,IRELAND
[4] HAMMERSMITH HOSP,DEPT CLIN ONCOL,LONDON W12 0HS,ENGLAND
[5] ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRM,ABERDEEN AB9 2ZB,SCOTLAND
[6] GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRM,DEPT MED ONCOL,GLASGOW G4 0SF,SCOTLAND
[7] ROYAL MARSDEN HOSP,SUTTON SM2 5PT,SURREY,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0140-6736(91)90554-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial was done to compare the efficacy and safety of a serotonin receptor antagonist - ondansetron - and dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of acute and delayed emesis and nausea induced by moderately emetogenic non-platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. Patients were treated as outpatients and received intravenous ondansetron 4 mg or dexamethasone 8 mg before chemotherapy and oral maintenance (ondansetron 4 mg every 6 h and dexamethasone reducing from 4 mg to 1 mg 6-hourly between days 1 and 5) for 5 days. 112 patients were treated (38 men, 73 women, 1 with no gender recorded; age range 30-73 years) and 100 were evaluable for cross-over analysis. Patients taking ondansetron or dexamethasone reported no significant difference in complete and major control of acute (83% vs 79%, p = 0.46) or delayed (82% vs 88%, p = 0.214) emesis (vomiting plus retches). Significantly more patients on dexamethasone (87%) than on ondansetron (72%) reported control of delayed nausea (days 2-5) (p = 0.003). Both drugs were well tolerated with no significant difference in the number of adverse events, and this is reflected by similar patient preference for ondansetron (40%) and dexamethasone (30%) (p = 0.244). Both drugs offer adequate out-patient control of chemotherapy-induced emesis; however, dexamethasone has an advantage in the control of delayed nausea, and also in terms of cost and resource allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 487
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] AAPRO M, 1983, J CLIN ONCOL, V2, P466
  • [2] ON THE RECEIVING END PATIENT PERCEPTION OF THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY
    COATES, A
    ABRAHAM, S
    KAYE, SB
    SOWERBUTTS, T
    FREWIN, C
    FOX, RM
    TATTERSALL, MHN
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 19 (02): : 203 - 208
  • [3] EFFICACY OF ONDANSETRON (GR-38032F) AND THE ROLE OF SEROTONIN IN CISPLATIN-INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    CUBEDDU, LX
    HOFFMANN, IS
    FUENMAYOR, NT
    FINN, AL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (12) : 810 - 816
  • [4] COMPARISON OF ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF DOMPERIDONE, METOCLOPRAMIDE, AND DEXAMETHASONE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING OUTPATIENT CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS
    CUNNINGHAM, D
    EVANS, C
    GAZET, JC
    FORD, H
    POPLE, A
    DEARLING, J
    CHAPPELL, D
    COOMBES, C
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 295 (6592) : 250 - 250
  • [5] PREVENTION OF EMESIS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING CYTOTOXIC DRUGS BY GR38032F, A SELECTIVE 5-HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST
    CUNNINGHAM, D
    POPLE, A
    FORD, HT
    HAWTHORN, J
    GAZET, JC
    CHALLONER, T
    COOMBES, RC
    [J]. LANCET, 1987, 1 (8548) : 1461 - 1463
  • [6] CUNNINGHAM D, 1989, LANCET, V1, P1323
  • [7] DRAPKIN RL, 1982, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V1, pC236
  • [8] EISMAN JA, 1986, CONCURRENT THERAPY, V27, P42
  • [9] DEXAMETHASONE CAN POTENTIATE THE ANTI-EMETIC ACTION OF A 5HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST ON CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE INDUCED VOMITING IN THE FERRET
    HAWTHORN, J
    CUNNINGHAM, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 61 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [10] GR-38032F (GR-C507/75) - A NOVEL COMPOUND EFFECTIVE IN THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE CISPLATIN-INDUCED EMESIS
    HESKETH, PJ
    MURPHY, WK
    LESTER, EP
    GANDARA, DR
    KHOJASTEH, A
    TAPAZOGLOU, E
    SARTIANO, GP
    WHITE, DR
    WERNER, K
    CHUBB, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (06) : 700 - 705