RECURSIONS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL MODEL

被引:8
作者
DHAENE, J
VANDEBROEK, M
机构
[1] K.U. Leuven, Leuven
关键词
RECURSION FORMULA; AGGREGATE CLAIMS DISTRIBUTION; ARBITRARY CLAIM AMOUNT; EFFICIENCY; INDIVIDUAL MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/0167-6687(94)00029-E
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recently, Waldmann considered an algorithm to compute the aggregate claims distribution in the individual life model which is an efficient reformulation of the original exact algorithm of De Pril. In this paper we will show that in practice the approximations as proposed by De Pril are still more efficient than the exact algorithm of Waldmann both in terms of the number of computations required and of the memory occupied by intermediate results. Furthermore we will generalize the algorithm of Waldmann to arbitrary claim amount distributions. We will compare this algorithm with respect to efficiency with the algorithms that were derived by De Pril for this model. It turns out that the approximations of De Pril are most efficient for practical computations.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 38
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
De Pril N., 1985, ASTIN BULL, V15, P135
[2]  
DePril N., 1988, SCANDINAVIAN ACTUARI, P61
[3]  
DePril N., 1989, ASTIN BULL, V19, P9
[4]  
DePril N., 1986, ASTIN BULL, V16, P109
[5]   ON A CLASS OF APPROXIMATIVE COMPUTATION METHODS IN THE INDIVIDUAL RISK MODEL [J].
DHAENE, J ;
DEPRIL, N .
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 1994, 14 (02) :181-196
[6]   ERROR-BOUNDS FOR THE COMPOUND POISSON APPROXIMATION [J].
GERBER, HU .
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 1984, 3 (03) :191-194
[7]  
Goovaerts M. J., 1990, EFFECTIVE ACTUARIAL
[8]   HOW TO (AND HOW NOT TO) COMPUTE STOP-LOSS PREMIUMS IN PRACTICE [J].
KAAS, R .
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 1993, 13 (03) :241-254
[9]  
Panjer Harry H., 1981, ASTIN BULL, V12, P22, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S0515036100006796, 10.1017/ S0515036100006796]
[10]  
VANDEBROEK M, 1988, B R ASS BELG ACTUAR, V82, P21