AN EXTENDED PHASE-II TRIAL OF IFOSFAMIDE PLUS MESNA IN MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA

被引:28
作者
FALKSON, G
HUNT, M
BORDEN, EC
HAYES, JA
FALKSON, CI
SMITH, TJ
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,DANA FARBER CANC INST,BOSTON,MA 02115
[2] UNIV WISCONSIN,CTR COMPREHENS CANC,MADISON,WI 53706
[3] BOSTON VA HOSP,BOSTON,MA
[4] TUFTS UNIV,NEW ENGLAND MED CTR,BOSTON,MA 02111
关键词
MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA; IFOSFAMIDE PLUS MESNA;
D O I
10.1007/BF00944192
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Forty three patients with histologically confirmed malignant mesothelioma were entered onto an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group phase II study of ifosfamide given with mesna. Eligibility criteria included adequate performance status, hemogram and renal functions. Ifosfamide was given at 1.5 g/m2 in 200 ml of normal saline over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion on days 1 to 5 of each 21 day cycle. Mesna was given at 300 mg/m2 on each day of ifosfamide at 0,4 and 8 hours. Two patients were cancelled and one patient was ineligible. The most common toxicity was haematologic. More than 50% of the patients had at least one episode of severe or life threatening toxicity and 2 patients had lethal toxicity (1 renal and 1 pulmonary oedema attributed to treatment), and an additional 4 patients died while on study (2 of cardiac and 2 of cerebral vascular disease not considered directly related to treatment). Of the 40 eligible patients one was unevaluable for response, and one patient had a partial response lasting 6.3 months. Twenty four patients had a no change status with a median duration of 5 months. The median time to treatment failure for all eligible patients was 2.5 months. The median overall survival time (from registration) for all eligible patients was 6.9 months. In multi variable models, factors that predicted for a statistically significant poorer survival were age greater-than-or-equal-to 62, stage greater-than-or-equal-to 3, performance status poorer than 0 to 1 and prior surgery (i.e.: more than biopsy). The severe toxicity, documented in more than half of the patients, precludes any further dose escalation of ifosfamide in these patients. With only one. response among 39 evaluable patients, it is concluded, from this extended phase II trial, that ifosfamide does not have a worthwhile therapeutic effect in patients with malignant mesothelioma.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 343
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA - A DISEASE UNAFFECTED BY CURRENT THERAPEUTIC MANEUVERS [J].
ALBERTS, AS ;
FALKSON, G ;
GOEDHALS, L ;
VOROBIOF, DA ;
VANDERMERWE, CA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (03) :527-535
[2]   MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA - PHASE-II PILOT-STUDY OF IFOSFAMIDE AND MESNA [J].
ALBERTS, AS ;
FALKSON, G ;
VANZYL, L .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1988, 80 (09) :698-699
[3]   THE TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA OF THE PLEURA - REVIEW OF A 5-YEAR EXPERIENCE, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO RADIOTHERAPY [J].
BALL, DL ;
CRUICKSHANK, DG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1990, 13 (01) :4-9
[4]   PLEUROPNEUMONECTOMY IN MANAGEMENT OF DIFFUSE MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA OF PLEURA - EXPERIENCE WITH 29 PATIENTS [J].
BUTCHART, EG ;
ASHCROFT, T ;
BARNSLEY, WC ;
HOLDEN, MP .
THORAX, 1976, 31 (01) :15-24
[5]  
CANTWELL BMJ, 1986, CANCER TREAT REP, V70, P1335
[6]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[7]  
DAVILLE MJ, 1986, ANN THORAC SURG, V42, P612
[8]  
DELARIA GA, 1986, ANN THORAC SURG, V26, P3785
[9]  
DHINGRA HM, 1991, INVEST NEW DRUG, V9, P69
[10]  
EISENHAUER EA, 1986, CANCER TREAT REP, V70, P1029