SELECTION AGAINST SPROUTING DAMAGE IN WHEAT .2. HARVEST RIPENESS, GRAIN MATURITY AND GERMINABILITY

被引:10
作者
GORDON, IL
BALAAM, LN
DERERA, NF
机构
[1] UNIV SYDNEY, DEPT AGR BOT, SYDNEY 2006, NEW S WALES, AUSTRALIA
[2] UNIV SYDNEY, IA WATSON WHEAT RES CTR, INST PLANT BREEDING, NARRABRI 2390, NEW S WALES, AUSTRALIA
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH | 1979年 / 30卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1071/AR9790001
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Examination of grain development in two white-grained (non-dormant) and two red-grained (varying dormancy) wheat genotypes has clarified concepts of maturity with respect to grain dehydration, harvest ripeness, embryo maturity, base α-amylase activity and dry weight growth. Each maturity trait had a different pattern of development. The net level of grain maturity at harvest ripeness depended on the relative progress of the maturation traits at the time at which harvest ripeness was defined. Harvest ripeness is defined as the first attainment of 12°% moisture during primary dehydration of the grain, this being closely related to fitness for harvest. The effects of adopting other definitions of harvest ripeness (at 17°% and 20% grain moisture) are discussed. Significant differences amongst genotypes in development patterns, temporal placement, and harvest ripeness level were found in each maturity trait, and the differences were not parallel across traits. Differences in maturation did not coincide with differences in putative dormancy or grain colour. Results indicated that grain maturation was a multi-faceted process, with flexible synchronizations amongst maturation traits at any point in time, such as at harvest ripeness. Germination tests or a-amylase assays on progeny grain samples, at some time after harvest ripeness, measure differences in maturity as well as putative differences in dormancy. Interpretation only in terms of dormancy could be misleading. Adjustment for immaturity is discussed. © 1979 CSIRO.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN S, 1965, EUPHYTICA, V14, P91
[2]  
Belderok B., 1968, Field Crop Abstracts, V21, P203
[3]   VARIETAL DIFFERENCES IN WHEAT IN RESISTANCE TO GERMINATION IN EAR AND ALPHA-AMYLASE CONTENT OF GRAIN [J].
BINGHAM, J ;
WHITMORE, ET .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1966, 66 :197-&
[4]  
BLISS CC, 1952, STATISTICS BIOASSAY
[5]  
BRYAN WW, 1964, SOME CONCEPTS METHOD, P201
[6]  
Ching T. M., 1972, Seed biology. Volume 2. Germination control, metabolism, and pathology., P103
[7]  
Derera N. F., 1976, Cereal Research Communications, V4, P173
[8]  
DRAPER NR, 1966, APPLIED REGRESSION A
[9]   EFFECT OF AWNS AND DROUGHT ON SUPPLY OF PHOTOSYNTHATE AND ITS DISTRIBUTION WITHIN WHEAT EARS [J].
EVANS, LT ;
SUTHERLAND, J ;
JACKSON, P ;
BINGHAM, J .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1972, 70 (01) :67-+
[10]  
EVERSON E. H., 1961, Quarterly Bulletin. Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station, V43, P820