EFFECTS OF LODGING ON DRY-MATTER PRODUCTION, GRAIN-YIELD AND NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION AT DIFFERENT GROWTH-STAGES IN MAIZE (ZEA-MAYS L)

被引:34
作者
MINAMI, M
UJIHARA, A
机构
[1] Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University, Ina, Nagano
关键词
DRY MATTER PRODUCTION; GRAIN YIELD; GROWTH ANALYSIS; LIGHT-INTERCEPTING CHARACTERISTICS; LODGING; MAIZE; NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1626/jcs.60.107
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
To analyze the mechanism of damage to yield of maize by lodging, root lodging (RL) and stalk lodging (SL) were mechanically induced at four growth stages, and their effects on canopy architecture, dry matter and grain yield, and nutritional composition were investigated. Except for RL 15 days before silking, a decrease of dry matter and grain yield by treatment was observed. An uneven distribution of leaves in the narrow spaces of lodged canopy reduced the net assimilation rate (NAR). Increased reduction of the NAR occurred as the treatment stage advanced, more so by SL than by RL. Crop growth rate (CGR) correlated closely with the NAR. These results indicated that due to lodging, a reduction of the NAR was correspondingly the primary cause of a reduction of the CGR, and of subsequent yield reductions. Reduction of leaf area also decreased the CGR. Translocation of assimilates from foliage to ear was not inhibited by lodging. Being lowest by SL at silking, grain yield correlated with the number of grains per ear. It was concluded that lodging at silking decreased the number of grains per ear and caused the most serious damage to grain yield. All treatments caused a change in the nutritional composition of ear and foliage.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 115
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Manual of regional adaptability test for grass and forage crops, Natl. Grassland Res. Inst., pp. 35-37, (1978)
[2]  
Albrecht B., Dudley J.W., Divergent selection for stalk quality and grain yield in adapted x exotic maize population cross, Crop Sci., 27, pp. 487-494, (1987)
[3]  
Aldrich S.R., Scott W.O., Leng E.R., Modern Corn Production., pp. 1-18, (1975)
[4]  
Allison J.C.S., Effect of plant population on the production and distribution of dry matter in maize, Ann. Appl. Biol., 63, pp. 135-144, (1969)
[5]  
Berzonsky W.A., Hawk J.A., Agronomic features of two maize synthetics selected for high and low stalk-crushing strength, Crop Sci., 26, pp. 871-875, (1986)
[6]  
Day A.D., Dickson A.D., Effect of artificial lodging on grain and malt quality of fall-sown irrigated barley, Agron. J., 50, pp. 338-340, (1958)
[7]  
Daynard T.B., Tanner J.W., Hume D.J., Contribution of stalk soluble carbohydrates to grain yield in corn(Zea mays L.), Crop Sci., 9, pp. 831-834, (1969)
[8]  
Dennis R.E., Day A.D., Miyata S., Crop lodging, Crop Physiology. Advancing Frontiers., pp. 133-149, (1984)
[9]  
Duncan W.G., Hatfield A.L., Ragland J.L., The growth and yield of corn II, Daily growth of corn kernels. Agron. J., 57, pp. 221-222, (1965)
[10]  
Duvick D.N., Genetic rates of gain in hybrid maize yields during the past 40 years, Maydica, 22, pp. 187-196, (1977)