Local Government Risk Assessment: The Effect of Government Type on Credit Rating Decisions in Texas

被引:18
作者
Greer, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Publ Adm & Policy, 414 Baldwin Hall,355 South Jackson St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/pbaf.12082
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
In consideration of increased levels of debt issued by special purpose local governments, this study explores the relationship between local government type and credit rating decisions. Investors use credit ratings as a signal for default risk, and risk level is a function of local economic base including service responsibilities and revenue sources. Governmental functions and economic bases vary across local government types which affect credit rating decisions. Specifically, special purpose governments have more limited responsibilities and revenue sources compared to general purpose governments. To model the decision of agency selection a multivariate probit model is estimated using bond deals from six different types of local governments in Texas. Findings suggest differences among general purpose and special purpose local governments. This supports the hypothesis that economic base affects credit rating decisions. Results indicate that credit rating agencies evaluate and weight information differently, and that local governments chose rating agencies in response.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 90
页数:21
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The impact of rating agency reputation on local government bond yields [J].
Allen, Arthur C. ;
Dudney, Donna M. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2008, 33 (01) :57-76
[2]   SEARCH FOR INFORMATION BY UNDERWRITERS AND ITS IMPACT ON MUNICIPAL INTEREST COST [J].
BENSON, ED .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1979, 34 (04) :871-885
[3]   THE INTEREST COST SAVINGS FROM EXPERIENCE IN THE MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET [J].
BLAND, RL .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1985, 45 (01) :233-237
[4]  
Bland Robert L., 1984, PUBLIC BUDGETING FIN, V4, P53
[5]   Differences of opinion and selection bias in the credit rating industry [J].
Cantor, R ;
Packer, F .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1997, 21 (10) :1395-1417
[6]   LOCAL FISCAL-POLICIES, DEFAULT RISK, AND MUNICIPAL BORROWING COSTS [J].
CAPECI, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1994, 53 (01) :73-89
[7]   Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood [J].
Cappellari, Lorenzo ;
Jenkins, Stephen P. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2003, 3 (03) :278-294
[8]   THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTING INFORMATION AND BOND RATING CHANGES [J].
COPELAND, RM ;
INGRAM, RW .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1982, 20 (02) :275-289
[9]   BIDDING FOR SECURITIES - EFFECT ON ISSUERS INTEREST COSTS [J].
EDERINGTON, LH .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1978, 51 (04) :673-686
[10]   WHY SPLIT RATINGS OCCUR [J].
EDERINGTON, LH .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1986, 15 (01) :37-47