ON THE EFFICIENCIES OF ABSORPTION HEAT-PUMPS

被引:15
作者
JERNQVIST, A
ABRAHAMSSON, K
ALY, G
机构
[1] Department of Chemical Engineering I, Lund University, S-221 00 Lund
来源
HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMS & CHP | 1992年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
Absorption heat pumps (AHP) - Coefficient of performance (COP);
D O I
10.1016/0890-4332(92)90015-A
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although commonly used, the coefficient of performance COP is not always an adequate measure to describe the effectiveness of a sorption heat pump. Equations for four different efficiencies are derived, discussed and compared for absorption heat pumps (AHP). A flow-sheeting computer program, developed for both design and evaluation simulations of arbitrarily complex absorption cycles, is used to exemplify the derived equations. The working fluid pair H2O-LiBr has been used in two different AHP configurations. The examples given clearly show that the COP can only be used to compare different AHPs operated at the same circulation ratio. The COP can be considered as an indicator of the effectiveness of heat exchange within and thermal insulation of a heat pump operated al a fixed circulation ratio. Nevertheless, it is an insufficient measure to compare different AHPs, even when they are operated at the same circulation ratio. On the other hand, the coefficient of performance for cooling Q(e)/Q(g) is better in this respect since it takes into account the real heat flow to the generator The Carnot efficiency COP(rev) takes into consideration both the real heat outputs from the absorber and condenser, and the temperature of heat sources and heat sinks. The thermodynamic efficiency E(th) is shown to be a more logical measure of the heat pump efficiency, since it takes into account the real heat input to the generator. The exergetic efficiency E(ex) can be considered as an alternative to the thermodynamic efficiency E(th) but it offers a possibility to take into account any temperature level where heat energy may be considered worthless. However, both E(ex) and E(th) are not conventionally used since their numerical values are always less than 1.0. On the other hand, the exergetic index I(ex) is directly related to E(ex) but its numerical value should be considered as a more significant measure for evaluating the performance of AHP systems, since it properly takes into account the exergy losses which inevitably occur in the system. It may however be stressed that exergy analysis should be used as a compliment to the First Law analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 480
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Trepp, History and prospects of heat transformation, Int. J. Refrig., 6, pp. 309-318, (1983)
[2]  
Moser, Schnitzer, Heat Pumps in Industry, (1985)
[3]  
Clark, Chemical heat pumps drive to upgrade waste heat, Chem. Engng, 91, 4, pp. 50-51, (1984)
[4]  
Eriksson, Jernqvist, Heat transformers with self-circulation: Design and preliminary operational data, Int. J. Refrig., 12, pp. 15-20, (1989)
[5]  
Abrahamsson, Aly, Jernqvist, Heat transformer systems for evaporation applications in the pulp and paper industry, Nordic Pulp Paper Research J., (1991)
[6]  
Aly, Abrahamsson, Jernqvist, Application of absorption heat transformers for energy conservation in the oleochemical industry, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., (1992)
[7]  
Scheihing, Cuervo, Market opportunities of industrial heat pumps in the United States, IEA Heat Pump Centre Newsletter, 8, 4, pp. 16-19, (1990)
[8]  
Brzustowski, Golem, Second Law analysis of energy processes, Part I: Exergy—an introduction, Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Engrs, 4, pp. 209-218, (1976)
[9]  
Golem, Brzustowski, Second Law analysis of energy processes, Part II: The performance of simple heat exchangers, Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Engrs., 4, pp. 219-226, (1976)
[10]  
Moran, Availability Analysis: A Guide to Efficient Energy Use, (1982)