DOES MAGNESIUM-SULFATE AFFECT THE LENGTH OF LABOR INDUCTION IN WOMEN WITH PREGNANCY-ASSOCIATED HYPERTENSION

被引:44
作者
ATKINSON, MW [1 ]
GUINN, D [1 ]
OWEN, J [1 ]
HAUTH, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ALABAMA,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,DIV MATERNAL FETAL MED,CTR OBSTET RES,BIRMINGHAM,AL 35294
关键词
LABOR INDUCTION; PRECLAMPSIA; MAGNESIUM SULFATE;
D O I
10.1016/0002-9378(95)91357-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether seizure prophylaxis with magnesium sulfate prolongs induction of labor in women with pregnancy-associated hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: Women with a singleton pregnancy in Vertex presentation between 32 and 42 weeks' gestation who required induction of labor for either preeclampsia, preeclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension, or transient hypertension were randomized to receive either magnesium sulfate or phenytoin (Dilantin) for seizure prophylaxis. Women with rupture of the membranes, spontaneous contractions resulting in cervical change, or an initial cervical examination showing > 2 cm dilatation and 50% effacement were excluded. RESULTS: Fifty-Pour Women were randomized to receive either magnesium sulfate (n = 28) or phenytoin (n = 26). The two groups were similar for selected maternal antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum characteristics that have been associated with a prolongation or failure of labor induction. The two groups were also similar for the interval from the start of induction to (1) the first examination greater than or equal to 5 cm cervical dilatation and (2) delivery and in the frequency of women requiring cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Compared with phenytoin, magnesium sulfate seizure prophylaxis in women with pregnancy-associated hypertension does not prolong the induction of labor nor does it result in an increase in cesarean deliveries.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1222
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   MAGNESIUM-SULFATE VERSUS PHENYTOIN FOR SEIZURE PROPHYLAXIS IN PREGNANCY-INDUCED HYPERTENSION [J].
APPLETON, MP ;
KUEHL, TJ ;
RAEBEL, MA ;
ADAMS, HR ;
KNIGHT, AB ;
GOLD, WR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (04) :907-913
[2]   FAILED INDUCTION OF LABOR [J].
ARULKUMARAN, S ;
GIBB, DMF ;
TAMBYRAJA, RL ;
HENG, SH ;
RATNAM, SS .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1985, 25 (03) :190-193
[3]  
BISHOP EH, 1964, OBSTET GYNECOL, V24, P266
[4]  
Field N. T., 1993, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, V168, P391
[5]  
FRIEDMAN SA, 1990, 10TH ANN M SOC PER O, P16
[6]  
HARBERT GM, 1989, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V105, P94
[7]   UTERINE CONTRACTION PRESSURES WITH OXYTOCIN INDUCTION AUGMENTATION [J].
HAUTH, JC ;
HANKINS, GDV ;
GILSTRAP, LC ;
STRICKLAND, DM ;
VANCE, P .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1986, 68 (03) :305-309
[8]  
HOLLANDER DI, 1987, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V156, P433
[9]  
PETRIE RH, 1976, OBSTET GYNECOL, V48, P431
[10]  
SLATER RM, 1987, LANCET, V1, P1417