INCORPORATING RISK ATTITUDE INTO COMPARISON OF REFORESTATION ALTERNATIVES

被引:22
作者
KANGAS, J
机构
[1] Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Research Station, Joensuu, SF-80101
关键词
DECISION ANALYSIS; FOREST PLANNING; PREFERENCE MODELING; REFORESTATION; RISK MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/02827589409382843
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
By using the approach presented in this paper, the decision-maker's risk attitude can be ascertained and taken into account in the comparison of reforestation alternatives of a forest stand. Risks which reforestation alternatives include are described using distributions of outcomes. Cardinal utility values of five accumulation points of cumulative distributions of outcomes, calculated without considering risk preferences, are the variables included in a preference function. The parameters of that additive preference function represent the importance of the accumulation points in the choice of the reforestation alternative. They indicate the decision-maker's attitude towards risk. The parameters are estimated on the basis of pairwise comparisons between the importance of variables, using Saaty's eigenvalue method. Estimation, application, and interpretation of the preference function are simple to carry out, which is important for an approach applied to practical decision-making. The approach could be applied also, for example, to other forestry decision-making problems.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 304
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   DECISION-ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION - COMBINING INFORMATION AND PREFERENCES USING AQUINAS AND AXOTL [J].
BRADSHAW, JM ;
BOOSE, JH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1990, 32 (02) :121-186
[2]  
BRUMELLE S, 1990, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V35, P279
[3]  
BUONGIORNO J, 1988, USDA RM161 FOR SERV, P216
[4]   DECISION DIFFICULTY AND IMPRECISE PREFERENCES [J].
BUTLER, D ;
LOOMES, G .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1988, 68 (1-3) :183-196
[5]  
CAMACHO A, 1989, THEOR DECIS, V12, P359
[6]  
DUERR WA, 1979, FOREST RESOURCE MANA
[7]   RELATIVE RISK-AVERSION [J].
DYER, JS ;
SARIN, RK .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1982, 28 (08) :875-886
[8]   REMARKS ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
DYER, JS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (03) :249-258
[9]  
DYER JS, 1990, MANAGE SCI, V36, P274, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.36.3.274
[10]  
ELION S, 1982, OMEGA, V10, P223