RACIAL-DIFFERENCES IN TUMOR GRADE AMONG WOMEN WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER

被引:40
作者
HILL, HA
COATES, RJ
AUSTIN, H
CORREA, P
ROBBOY, SJ
CHEN, V
CLICK, LA
BARRETT, RJ
BOYCE, JG
KOTZ, HL
HARLAN, LC
机构
[1] LOUISIANA STATE UNIV, MED CTR, DEPT PATHOL, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112 USA
[2] DUKE UNIV, MED CTR, DEPT PATHOL OBSTET & GYNECOL, DURHAM, NC 27706 USA
[3] WAKE FOREST UNIV, BOWMAN GRAY SCH MED, WINSTON SALEM, NC 27109 USA
[4] SUNY HLTH SCI CTR, DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL, BROOKLYN, NY 11203 USA
[5] GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV HOSP, DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL, WASHINGTON, DC USA
[6] NCI, DIV CANC PREVENT & CONTROL, BETHESDA, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1995.1024
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Black women with endometrial cancer have more advanced disease and less favorable tumor grade than do white women. This study evaluated whether racial differences in tumor grade could be explained by hormone-related factors and other putative determinants of grade. Subjects included 207 white and 81 black postmenopausal women diagnosed with primary cancer of the uterine corpus between 1985 and 1987. Blacks had poorer tumor grade than whites (odds ratio for FIGO grade 2 versus grade 1 is 1.8; odds ratio for grade 3 versus grade 1 is 2.8). Over 75% of the excess of poorly differentiated tumors versus well-differentiated tumors among blacks could be explained by racial differences in use of replacement estrogens, age at first pregnancy, history of oophorectomy, poverty, stage of disease, use of screening, and access to health care. The most prominent factor was estrogen therapy, which was associated with favorable tumor grade and was used much less frequently by blacks. Although not statistically significant, a moderate racial difference in tumor grade remained after control of the potential explanatory variables. This may reflect true biologic variation between blacks and whites and may explain, in part, the observation that blacks with endometrial cancer have a worse prognosis. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 163
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] AUSTIN H, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P568
  • [2] RACIAL-DIFFERENCES IN SURVIVAL OF WOMEN WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
    BAIN, RP
    GREENBERG, RS
    CHUNG, KC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 157 (04) : 914 - 923
  • [3] DIET AND ENDOMETRIAL CANCER - A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
    BARBONE, F
    AUSTIN, H
    PARTRIDGE, EE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 137 (04) : 393 - 403
  • [4] DIET AND FEMALE SEX-HORMONE CONCENTRATIONS - AN INTERVENTION STUDY FOR THE TYPE OF FAT CONSUMED
    BENNETT, FC
    INGRAM, DM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1990, 52 (05) : 808 - 812
  • [5] ENDOGENOUS HORMONES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK
    BERNSTEIN, L
    ROSS, RK
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1993, 15 (01) : 48 - 65
  • [6] BRINTON LA, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V81, P265
  • [7] CONJUGATED ESTROGEN USE AND RISK OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
    BURING, JE
    BAIN, CJ
    EHRMANN, RL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1986, 124 (03) : 434 - 441
  • [8] THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SERUM SEX-HORMONES IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
    CAULEY, JA
    GUTAI, JP
    KULLER, LH
    LEDONNE, D
    POWELL, JG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 129 (06) : 1120 - 1131
  • [9] Chepick O. F., 1993, European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, V14, P144
  • [10] CREASMAN WT, 1993, CURR OPIN OBSTET GYN, V5, P80