PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY OF EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA

被引:3
作者
OMURA, GA
SILLER, BS
机构
[1] Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
[2] GBDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
来源
SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 1994年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
OVARIAN CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; TAXOL (PACLITAXEL);
D O I
10.1002/ssu.2980100409
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This review provides a perspective on primary chemotherapeutic approaches in epithelial ovarian cancer. Chemotherapy is not recommended in grade 1 or 2 stage I-a or b. In other early-stage cases, postoperative melphalan or intraperitoneal radioactive phosphorus remain standard of care, even though these treatments have not been shown in a randomized fashion to be superior to no further treatment. The role of platinum-based chemotherapy in the same subgroup is currently under study. Despite the introduction of cisplatin, leading to significantly improved response rates, responses have usually been brief in stage Ill and IV cases with only a modest impact on overall survival and little improvement in long-term survival. Systemic intensification with cisplatin has been difficult secondary to more toxicity and with no consistent improvement in survival. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is being evaluated as a component of initial management. Recently a new drug, Taxol, has been introduced; although it has not been a cure-all, Taxol will presumably become part of the primary chemotherapy of ovarian cancer in the 1990s. Issues of optimal dosing and combinations with Taxol are being addressed. The combination of Taxol and cisplatin appears promising. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Young RC, Walton LA, Ellenberg SS, Et al., Adjuvant therapy in stage I and stage II epithelial ovarian cancer: Results of two prospective randomized trials, N Engl J Med, 322, pp. 1021-1027, (1990)
[2]  
Rubin SC, Wong GYC, Curtin JP, Et al., Platinum‐based chemotherapy of high‐risk stage I epithelial ovarian cancer following comprehensive surgical staging, Obstet Gynecol, 82, pp. 143-147, (1993)
[3]  
Bolis G, Colombo N, Favalli G, Et al., Randomized multicenter clinical trial in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 11, (1992)
[4]  
Vergote IB, Vergote-De Vos LN, Abeler VM, Et al., Randomized trial comparing cisplatin with radioactive phosphorus or whole‐abdomen irradiation as adjuvant treatment of ovarian cancer, Cancer, 69, pp. 741-749, (1992)
[5]  
Omura GA, Morrow CP, Blessing JA, Et al., A randomized comparison of melphalan versus melphalan plus hexamethylelamine versus adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide in ovarian carcinoma, Cancer, 51, pp. 783-789, (1983)
[6]  
Randomized comparison of cisplatin with cyclophosphamide/cisplatin and with cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin /cisplatin in advanced ovarian cancer, Lancet, 2, pp. 353-359, (1987)
[7]  
Young RC, Ozols RF, Myers CE, The anthracycline antineoplastic drugs, N Engl J Med, 305, pp. 139-153, (1981)
[8]  
Depalo GM, DeLena M, Bonadonna G, Adriamycin versus adriamycin plus melphalan in advanced ovarian carcinoma, Cancer Treat Rep, 61, pp. 355-357, (1977)
[9]  
Wheeler RH, Ensminger WD, Thrall JH, Anderson JL, Highdose doxorubicin: An exploration of the dose‐response curve in human neoplasia, Cancer Treat Rep, 66, pp. 493-498, (1982)
[10]  
Smith JP, Rutledge FN, Random study of hexamethylmelamine, 5‐fluorouracil, and melphalan in treatment of advanced carcinoma of the ovary, Natl Cancer Inst Monog, 42, pp. 169-172, (1975)