FOOD-ASSOCIATED CALLS IN RHESUS MACAQUES (MACACA-MULATTA) .2. COSTS AND BENEFITS OF CALL PRODUCTION AND SUPPRESSION

被引:86
作者
HAUSER, MD
MARLER, P
机构
[1] Animal Communication Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of California, Davis
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FOOD-ASSOCIATED CALLS; HONEST SIGNALING; OWNERSHIP; PUNISHMENT; REFERENTIAL SIGNALING; RHESUS MONKEYS; WITHHOLDING INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1093/beheco/4.3.206
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In field experiments, free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) gave food-associated calls in 45% of the trials in which they were presented with food, either monkey chow or coconut; they did not call in control trials when sticks were presented. Consistent with prior naturalistic observations, adult females called in a higher proportion of trials than adult males. Coconut, one of the most highly preferred food items in the diet, elicited different call types and a higher rate of calling from ''discoverers'' than did chow. The call types produced to coconut (warbles, harmonic arches, and chirps) were primarily those that, under nonexperimental conditions, were associated with relatively rare and preferred foods. In contrast, coos and grunts were primarily produced in response to chow. The relative hunger level of the discoverer had no significant effect on the call type produced but did affect the rate of call production; discoverers called at higher rates when they were hungry. Upon hearing food-associated calls, individuals within the vicinity of the discovery responded by rapidly approaching the caller. A larger number of individuals approached when discoverers called than when they did not. Discoverers who failed to call received significantly more aggression from group members and, in the case of females, actually consumed less food than discoverers who called. The probability of receiving aggression did not appear to be associated with the discoverer's dominance rank. Results suggest that food-associated calls are ''honest'' signals reflecting food possession. Those who fail to signal and are caught with food are apparently punished.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 212
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Berard J., Life Histories of Rhesus Macaque Males (Phd Dissertation), (1990)
[2]  
Caldwell R., The deceptive use of reputation by stomatopods, Deception: Perspectives on Human and Nonhuman Deceit, pp. 129-145, (1986)
[3]  
Cheney D.L., Seyfarth R.M., Vervet monkey alarm calls: Manipulation through shared information?, Behaviour, 94, pp. 150-166, (1985)
[4]  
Cheney D.L., Seyfarth R.M., How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species, (1990)
[5]  
Dawkins R., Krebs J.R., Animal signals: Information or manipulation, Behavioral Ecology, pp. 282-309, (1978)
[6]  
Grafen A., Biological signals as handicaps, J Theor Biol, 144, pp. 475-546, (1990)
[7]  
Hamilton W.J., Arrowood P.C., Copulatory vocalizations of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus), gibbons (Hy-lobales hoolock) and humans, Science, 200, pp. 1405-1409, (1978)
[8]  
Hauser M.D., Do chimpanzee copulatory calls incite male-male competition?, Anim Behav, 39, pp. 596-597, (1990)
[9]  
Hauser M.D., Marier P., Food-associated calls in rhesus macaques (Macaco mulatto): I. Sodoecological factors, Behav Ecol, 4, pp. 194-205, (1993)
[10]  
Hauser M.D., Nelson DA, 1991. ‘Intentional’ signaling in animal communication, Trends Ecol Evol, 6, pp. 186-189