SUBVERSIVE RATIONALIZATION, TECHNOLOGY, POWER, AND DEMOCRACY

被引:53
作者
FEENBERG, A
机构
[1] Department of Philosophy, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
来源
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY | 1992年 / 35卷 / 3-4期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00201749208602296
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper argues, against technological and economic determinism, that the dominant model of industrial society is politically contingent. The idea that technical decisions are significantly constrained by ‘rationality’ - either technical or economic - is shown to be groundless. Constructivist and hermeneutic approaches to technology show that modem societies are inherently available for a different type of development in a different cultural framework. It is possible that, in the future, those who today are subordinated to technology’s rhythms and demands will be able to control it and to determine its evolution. I call the process of creating such a society ‘subversive rationalization’ because it requires technological advances that can only be made in opposition to the dominant hegemony. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 322
页数:22
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Bloor D, 1991, KNOWLEDGE SOCIAL IMA, V2nd
[2]  
Bourdieu P, 1977, OUTLINE THEORY PRACT
[3]  
Braverman H., 1998, LABOR MONOPOLY CAPIT
[4]  
BURKE JG, 1972, TECHNOLOGY CULTURE
[5]  
CAMBROSIO A, 1991, TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS, V3
[6]  
CERTEAU MD, WORKS
[7]  
Cohen J., 1983, DEMOCRACY TRANSFORMA
[8]  
Cunningham F., 1987, DEMOCRATIC THEORY SO
[9]  
Ellul Jacques, 1964, TECHNOLOGICAL SOC
[10]  
FEENBERG A, 1992, PHILOS FORUM, V23