TRANSTHORACIC DC SHOCK MAY REPRESENT A SERIOUS HAZARD IN PACEMAKER DEPENDENT PATIENTS

被引:39
作者
ALTAMURA, G [1 ]
BIANCONI, L [1 ]
LOBIANCO, F [1 ]
TOSCANO, S [1 ]
AMMIRATI, F [1 ]
PANDOZI, C [1 ]
CASTRO, A [1 ]
CARDINALE, M [1 ]
MENNUNI, M [1 ]
SANTINI, M [1 ]
机构
[1] SAN FILIPO NERI HOSP,DEPT HEART DIS,ROME,ITALY
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 1995年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
DC SHOCK; DEFIBRILLATION; PACING THRESHOLD; PACEMAKER MALFUNCTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02503.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
External defibrillation is widely used for the termination of various atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, including pacemaker patients. Our study was intended to evaluate the effects of DC shocks in 36 patients with unipolar pacemakers implanted in the right pectoral region (25 DDD, 10 WI, 3 AAI). The shocks were delivered with paddles on the anterior surface of the thorax, as far as possible away from the pacemaker. The pacing output was programmed at 0.5 msec and 5 V (25 patients), 4 V (1 patient), and 2.5 V (10 patients). Transient loss of capture occurred in 18 patients (50%). These patients, compared with those without capture failure, received higher peak and cumulative shock energies, respectively, 216 +/- 99 versus 123 +/- 50 joules (P < 0.002) and 352 +/- 62 versus 147 +/- 98 joules (P < 0.004) and had a lower pacemaker pulse amplitude (4.0 +/- 1.2 vs 4.6 +/- 1.0 V, P = 0.11). Failure to capture lasted from 5 seconds to 30 minutes (mean 157 sec). In 15 patients the ventricular stimulation threshold was measured before and serially after cardioversion. A six-fold threshold increase was observed 3 minutes after the shock (P (0.004) with gradual recovery to nearly baseline values at 24 hours. Transient sensing failure occurred in 7 of the 17 patients in whom it could be evaluated (41%). Furthermore, three cases of shock induced pacemaker malfunctions were observed requiring replacement of the stimulator in two patients. In conclusion, the incidence of loss of capture in pacemaker patients subjected to electrical cardioversion/defibrillation is high. The phenomenon is due to an abrupt rise in stimulation threshold, caused by the electrical shock, and may represent a serious hazard in pacemaker dependent patients. The risk of pacing failure could be reduced by utilizing low shock energies when possible, and by programming the pacemaker at its maximal output before cardioversion.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 198
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
ALYWARD P, 1979, PACE, V2, P462
[2]   REPROGRAMMING OF IMPLANTED PACEMAKER FOLLOWING EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION [J].
BAROLD, SS ;
ONG, LS ;
SCOVIL, J ;
HEINLE, RA ;
WRIGHT, T .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 1 (04) :514-520
[3]  
DAS G, 1981, PACE, V4, P462
[4]  
FYK L, 1969, AM J CARDIOL, V23, P244
[5]   PACEMAKER FAILURE FOLLOWING EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION [J].
GOULD, L ;
PATEL, S ;
GOMES, GI ;
CHOKSHI, AB .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 4 (05) :575-577
[6]  
HAUSER RG, 1978, CARDIAC PACING, pCH35
[7]   ADVERSE ACUTE AND CHRONIC EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL DEFIBRILLATION AND CARDIOVERSION ON IMPLANTED UNIPOLAR CARDIAC PACING SYSTEMS [J].
LEVINE, PA ;
BAROLD, SS ;
FLETCHER, RD ;
TALBOT, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1983, 1 (06) :1413-1422
[8]  
LEVINE PA, 1985, MODERN CARDIAC PACIN, P875
[9]  
Nielsen-Kudsk J E, 1992, Ugeskr Laeger, V154, P2571
[10]   DELAYED PULSE-GENERATOR MALFUNCTION AFTER DC COUNTERSHOCK [J].
PALAC, RT ;
HWANG, MH ;
KLODNYCKY, ML ;
LOEB, HS .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 4 (02) :163-167