EVALUATION OF THE AUTOSCAN-W/A RAPID SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFICATION AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF GRAM-NEGATIVE FERMENTATIVE BACILLI

被引:14
作者
YORK, MK
BROOKS, GF
FISS, EH
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.30.11.2903-2910.1992
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The autoSCAN-Walk-Away (W/A) system for identification and susceptibility testing was evaluated for 400 gram-negative fermentative bacteria by using the API 20E (366 isolates) and/or tube biochemical tests as the reference identification system and a frozen microdilution MIC tray system for susceptibility testing. The W/A system performed well for identification of this group of organisms representing 14 genera and 30 species, showing a sensitivity of 96% and results available in 2 h. Of the 16 misidentifications, 6 were with Serratia liquefaciens. A total of 63 isolates (17%) required further tests to complete the identification, compared with 106 (29%) of the isolates which required additional tests for the API 20E identification. Approximately half (32) of the additional tests with the W/A system were required in order to separate citrobacter diversus from C. amalonaticus. For susceptibility determinations, the W/A system demonstrated an overall agreement of 93% (4,102 determinations) with 40 major errors (0.98%). However, of the 906 resistant organism-drug combinations in the study, there were 115 very major errors, for a false-susceptibility rate of 12.7% of the resistance determinations. Among these very major errors, 80% occurred with piperacillin and the cephalosporins. The W/A system completed the MIC determinations in 7 h; however, the difficulty in detecting resistance with some antimicrobial agents limited the advantages of the rapid susceptibility testing.
引用
收藏
页码:2903 / 2910
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
BARTLETT RC, 1979, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V71, P194
[2]  
COLONNA P, 1990, 90TH ANN M AM SOC MI, P370
[3]   THE SYSTEMS-APPROACH TO DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY [J].
DAMATO, RF ;
HOLMES, B ;
BOTTONE, EJ .
CRC CRITICAL REVIEWS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 1981, 9 (01) :1-44
[4]  
DAMATO RF, 1985, MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO, P52
[5]  
DENYS G, 1990, 90TH ANN M AM SOC MI, P370
[6]   EVALUATION OF THE UPDATED MS-2 BACTERIAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM IN COMPARISON WITH THE API 20E SYSTEM [J].
DIPERSIO, JR ;
DYKE, JW ;
VANNEST, RD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1983, 18 (01) :128-135
[7]  
Ewing W.H., 1986, EDWARDS EWINGS IDENT
[8]   BIOCHEMICAL-IDENTIFICATION OF NEW SPECIES AND BIOGROUPS OF ENTEROBACTERIACEAE ISOLATED FROM CLINICAL SPECIMENS [J].
FARMER, JJ ;
DAVIS, BR ;
HICKMANBRENNER, FW ;
MCWHORTER, A ;
HUNTLEYCARTER, GP ;
ASBURY, MA ;
RIDDLE, C ;
WATHENGRADY, HG ;
ELIAS, C ;
FANNING, GR ;
STEIGERWALT, AG ;
OHARA, CM ;
MORRIS, GK ;
SMITH, PB ;
BRENNER, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1985, 21 (01) :46-76
[9]  
Farmer JJ., 1991, MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO, V5, P360
[10]  
GODSEY JH, 1991, PATHOL BIOL, V39, P461