THE EFFECT OF MIXING UNFAMILIAR INDIVIDUALS ON THE GROWTH AND PRODUCTION OF FINISHING PIGS

被引:47
作者
TAN, SSL [1 ]
SHACKLETON, DM [1 ]
BEAMES, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA, DEPT ANIM SCI, VANCOUVER V6T 2A2, BC, CANADA
来源
ANIMAL PRODUCTION | 1991年 / 52卷
关键词
BEHAVIOR; GROWTH; NEUROLEPTICS; PIGS;
D O I
10.1017/S0003356100005845
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The effect on productivity of mixing finishing pigs from different litters was studied. Two hundred and ten Yorkshire x Landrace pigs of about 76 kg were assigned in groups of six to each of four treatments. In treatment 1, pigs were retained as unmixed littermates while in treatments 2 and 3, three pigs from one litter were mixed with three pigs from another litter. Additionally pigs in treatment 3 were injected with a tranquilizer prior to mixing. In treatment 4, groups of five littermates were introduced into the pen of either a lighter weight or heavier weight pig. All groups were housed in 6.65 m2 partially slatted pens and fed from a communal food trough. Besides promoting aggression and fighting, mixing significantly depressed productivity, and both short-and long-term economic returns. Over the 3-week experimental period the proportional live-weight gains observed in the unmixed pigs over those of the mixed groups, were substantial: 0.099 over the 3:3 mixed groups, 0.141 over the tranquilizer-treated groups, and 0.127 over the 5:1 mixed groups. Consequently, mixing would necessitate additional inputs of food, housing, and labour because of the increased days to market. The tranquilizer not only did not eliminate fighting but had a long-term negative effect on production and was thus a contra-indicated expense. Introducing a single pig into a group in an occupied pen also lowered production, as did moving without mixing. However, moving effects were short lived and had minimal negative influences on overall productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 206
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   DOES FRUSTRATION INDUCE AGGRESSION IN PIGS [J].
ARNONE, M ;
DANTZER, R .
APPLIED ANIMAL ETHOLOGY, 1980, 6 (04) :351-362
[2]  
ASHFIELD G, 1984, FEEDSTUFFS, V56, P1
[3]   THE EFFECT OF PEN DESIGN AND THE TRANQUILIZING DRUG, AZAPERONE, ON THE GROWTH AND BEHAVIOR OF WEANED PIGS [J].
BLACKSHAW, JK .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1981, 57 (06) :272-276
[4]   ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF FIELD EXPERIMENTS IN PIGS IN UK AND IRELAND WITH SEDATIVE NEUROLEPTIC AZAPERONE [J].
CALLEAR, JFF ;
VANGESTE.JF .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1971, 89 (17) :453-&
[5]  
DANTZER R, 1970, Annales de Recherches Veterinaires, V1, P117
[6]  
DANTZER R, 1979, J VET PHARMACOL THER, V2, P200
[7]  
EWBANK R., 1972, Pig Production. Proc. 18th Easter Sch. agric. Sci. Univ. Nott. 1971, P129
[8]   AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR IN GROUPS OF DOMESTICATED PIGS ON REMOVAL AND RETURN OF INDIVIDUALS [J].
EWBANK, R ;
MEESE, GB .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1971, 13 (NOV) :685-&
[9]   BEHAVIOR OF GROWING PIGS DURING EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL ENCOUNTERS [J].
FRASER, D .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1974, 82 (FEB) :147-163
[10]   SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR AND GROWTH OF PIGS FOLLOWING MIXING DURING GROWING - FINISHING PERIOD [J].
GRAVES, HB ;
GRAVES, KL ;
SHERRITT, GW .
APPLIED ANIMAL ETHOLOGY, 1978, 4 (02) :169-180