COLLEGE-STUDENTS VIEWS OF MALE AND FEMALE COLLEGE-TEACHERS .2. EVIDENCE FROM STUDENTS EVALUATIONS OF THEIR CLASSROOM TEACHERS

被引:143
作者
FELDMAN, KA
机构
[1] Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, 11794-4356, NY
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00992161
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although a majority of studies have found that male and female college teachers do not differ in the global ratings they receive from their students, when statistically significant differences are found, more of them favor women than men. Across studies, the average association between gender and overall evaluation, while favoring women (average r = +.02), is so small as to be insignificant in practical terms. Considering specific instructional dimensions of evaluations, female teachers receive very slightly higher ratings on their sensitivity to and concern with class level and progress than do men (average r = +.12). On other specific dimensions, men and women either do not differ or the differences are trivial in size (or, for two dimensions, while nontrivial, based on too few studies to be generalizable with any degree of certainty). Students tend to rate same-gendered teachers a little higher than opposite-gendered teachers. Although interaction effects on evaluations have also been found between gender of teacher and other factors (academic rank of the teacher. academic area, class level of the course, difficulty of the teacher or course, and the teacher's pedagogical orientation or personality characteristics), they are inconsistent across studies. Moreover, ratings of teachers are sometimes enhanced by gender-typical, and sometimes by gender-atypical, attributes, behaviors, and positions. The findings are discussed in terms of the expectations or demands of students and whether or not student ratings are biased by the gender of the teacher.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 211
页数:61
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   VALIDITY OF STUDENT-RATINGS OF INSTRUCTION - WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE DO NOT [J].
ABRAMI, PC ;
COHEN, PA ;
DAPOLLONIA, S .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 82 (02) :219-231
[2]  
ALCIATORE ML, 1973, THESIS OKLAHOMA STAT
[3]  
ALCIATORE RT, 1979, IMPROVING COLLEGE U, V27, P93
[4]   INVESTIGATION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COLLEAGUE RATING, STUDENT RATING, RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY, AND ACADEMIC RANK IN RATING INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS [J].
ALEAMONI, LM ;
YIMER, M .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 64 (03) :274-277
[5]  
ALEAMONI LM, 1978, ANN M AM ANTHR ASS
[6]  
ALEAMONI LM, 1972, 331 U ILL MEAS RES D
[7]  
ALEAMONI LM, 1977, 3 U AR OFF INSTR RES
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1977, RES HIGHER ED, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00991288
[9]  
BARRETTLENNARD GT, 1962, PSYCHOL MONOGRAPHS, V76
[10]   STUDENT-EVALUATIONS OF COLLEGE PROFESSORS - ARE FEMALE AND MALE PROFESSORS RATED DIFFERENTLY [J].
BASOW, SA ;
SILBERG, NT .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 79 (03) :308-314