PROTANDRY, INCOMPATIBILITY, AND SECONDARY POLLEN PRESENTATION IN CEPHALANTHUS-OCCIDENTALIS (RUBIACEAE)

被引:29
作者
IMBERT, FM [1 ]
RICHARDS, JH [1 ]
机构
[1] FLORIDA INT UNIV,DEPT BIOL SCI,MIAMI,FL 33199
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2445386
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Cephalanthus occidentalis L. is protandrous and presents pollen secondarily on the stigma surface. Because self-Pollen is present on the stigma, the degree of selfing vs. outcrossing in this species will depend on 1) the phenology of pollen presentation and stigma receptivity; 2) whether the species is self-incompatible; and 3) the rates of self vs. crossed pollen tube growth. This study describes floral morphology and phenology, self-incompatibility, and pollen tube growth rates in self- and cross-pollinations of C occidentalis. Light and scanning electron microscopy were used to study stigma morphology after flower opening, while controlled pollinations tested for incompatibility. Stigmas were unreceptive initially but became receptive by the second day after flower opening. Ninety-two percent of cross-pollinated flowers set fruit, compared to 12% fruit set in self-pollinations. Pollen tubes from selfed and out-crossed pollen initially had similar growth rates. Out-crossed pollen tubes began to grow rapidly ca. 5 hr after pollination of a receptive stigma, whereas selfed pollen tubes ceased growth or grew slowly after this time. Pollen tubes from out-crossed pollen grew the length of the style within 24 hr after pollination, while selfed pollen tubes were inhibited at the stigma-style junction. Our results indicate that C occidentalis has self-incompatibility, in addition to protandry and secondary pollen presentation. Protandry allows removal of self-pollen from the unreceptive stigma, while self-incompatibility prevents fertilization by unremoved self-pollen.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 404
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
BARRETT S C H, 1990, Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, V55, P35
[2]   SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEMS IN THE RUBIACEAE OF A TROPICAL LOWLAND WET FOREST [J].
BAWA, KS ;
BEACH, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1983, 70 (09) :1281-1288
[3]   REGULATED POLLEN ISSUE IN ISOTOMA, CAMPANULACEAE, AND EVOLUTION OF SECONDARY POLLEN PRESENTATION [J].
BRANTJES, NBM .
ACTA BOTANICA NEERLANDICA, 1983, 32 (03) :213-222
[4]  
BREMEKAM.CE, 1966, ACTA BOT NEERL, V15, P1
[5]   COMPARATIVE RESTRICTION SITE MAPPING OF CHLOROPLAST DNA IMPLIES NEW PHYLOGENETIC-RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN RUBIACEAE [J].
BREMER, B ;
JANSEN, RK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1991, 78 (02) :198-213
[6]  
Bremer Birgitta, 1992, American Journal of Botany, V79, P1171, DOI 10.2307/2445217
[7]  
CAROLIN RC, 1960, P LINNEAN SOC NEW S, V84, P197
[8]  
de Nettancourt D., 1977, INCOMPATIBILITY ANGI
[9]  
DUDASH MR, 1990, EVOLUTION, V44, P1129, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05220.x
[10]  
Faegri K., 1979, PRINCIPLES POLLINATI, DOI [10.1016/C2009-0-00736-3, DOI 10.1016/C2009-0-00736-3]