MICROBIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF CHLORHEXIDINE IN A SUSTAINED-RELEASE DEVICE FOR DENTIN STERILIZATION

被引：52

作者：

HELING, I

SOMMER, M

STEINBERG, D

FRIEDMAN, M

SELA, MN

机构：

[1] Department of Endodontics, The Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem

[2] Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Hebrew University, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem

[3] Department of Oral Eiology, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem

来源：

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL | 1992年 / 25卷 / 01期

关键词：

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CAMPHORATED MONOCHLOROPHENOL; CHLORHEXIDINE; ROOT CANAL MEDICATION;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1365-2591.1992.tb00943.x

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

The aim of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine in solution and in a sustained-release device as an intracanal medication. Hollow cylindrical dentine specimens prepared from bovine incisors were incubated with Streptococcus faecalis for a period of 3 weeks. The intracanal medicaments tested were 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution (CH), chlorhexidine in a sustained-release device (1.2 mg) (SRD), camphorated paramonochlorophenol (CMCP), and a control (no medication). Each medicament was introduced into the lumen of one dentine specimen and incubated for 5 min, 24 h, 48 h or 7 days at 37-degrees-C. The bacteriological samples were taken by shaving the dentine inside the lumen with dental burs ranging in size from ISO 023-033. The dentine powder was collected in test-tubes containing growth medium and incubated for 24 h. The optical density of the medium was recorded by means of a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 540 nm. There was a statistically significant difference between the control group and all the medicaments tested.

引用

页码：15 / 19

页数：5

共 16 条

[1]

Bystrom A., Sundqvist G., Bacterioiogic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canel instrumentation in endodontic therapy, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 89, pp. 321-328, (1981)

[2]

Bystrom A., Claesson R., Sundqvist G., The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals, Endodontics and Dental Traumatology, 1, pp. 170-175, (1985)

[3]

Delany G.M., Patterson S.S., Miller C.H., Newton C.W., The effect of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation on the root canal flora of freshly extracted necrotic teeth, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 53, pp. 518-523, (1982)

[4]

Ellerbrch E.S., Murphy R.A., Antimicrobial activity of root canal medicament vapors, Journal of Endodontics, 3, pp. 189-193, (1977)

[5]

Engstrom B., Lunuberg M., The frequency and causes of reversal from negative to positive bacteriological tests in root canai therapy, Odontologisk Tidskrift, 74, pp. 189-195, (1966)

[6]

Fardalo, Turnbull R.S., A review of the literature on use of chlorhexidine in dentistry, Journal of the American Dental Association, 112, pp. 863-869, (1986)

[7]

Friedman M., Seinberg D., Sustained‐release delivery system of treatment of dental diseases, Pharmacological Research, 7, pp. 313-317, (1990)

[8]

Haapasalo M., ORstavik D., In‐vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules, Journal of Dental Research, 66, pp. 1375-1379, (1987)

[9]

Messer H.H., Chen R.S., The duration of effectiveness of root canal medicaments, Journal of Endodontics., 10, pp. 240-245, (1984)

[10]

Seltzer S., Bender I.B., Turkenkopk S., Factors affecting successful repair after root canal therapy, Journal of the American Dental Association, 67, pp. 651-662, (1963)

← 1 2 →