A COMPARATIVE TREATMENT TRIAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS USING THE GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE AGONIST, NAFARELIN, AND THE SYNTHETIC STEROID, DANAZOL

被引:30
作者
FRASER, IS
SHEARMAN, RP
JANSEN, RPS
SUTHERLAND, PD
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sydney
[2] Department of Endocrinology and Fertility, Royal Prince Alfred
[3] King George V Hospitals, Sydney
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1479-828X.1991.tb01807.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
A randomized and double-blind trial was carried out comparing intranasal nafarelin acetate (400-mu-g daily) and oral danazol (600 mg daily), given over 6 months, in the treatment of 49 patients with laparoscopically proven endometriosis. Both drugs produced a highly significant and similar reduction (of 60 to 70%) in objective American Fertility Society scoring, even in severe disease. No effect was seen on adhesions. Both drugs suppressed oestradiol levels to a similar extent, although nafarelin caused a substantial rise in the first 2 weeks after the initiation of therapy. Nafarelin suppressed LH substantially and FSH, testosterone and prolactin to a small degree, whereas FSH and LH increased slightly during danazol. Pregnancies occurred in 12 of 22 infertile women in the 12 months following nafarelin, and in 6 of 14 in the danazol group. Side-effects were reported at a similar rate with both drugs, but the pattern was different. Hot flushes were the predominant side effect with nafarelin, although oestradiol levels were not suppressed to the extent expected. Small amounts of spotting or light bleeding were experienced with both drugs, but these tended to decrease with time with nafarelin and increase with danazol.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 163
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
McLachlan RI, Healy DL, Burger HG, Clinical aspects of LHRH analogues in gynaecology: a review, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 93, pp. 431-454, (1986)
[2]  
Revised classification of endometriosis, Fertil Steril, 43, pp. 347-352, (1985)
[3]  
Butler L., Wilson E., Belisle S., Et al., Collaborative study of pregnancy rates following danazol therapy of stage 1 endometriosis, Fertil Steril, 41, pp. 373-376, (1984)
[4]  
Schweppe K-W, Endometriosis. Advances in Reproductive Endocrinology, 1, Current medical therapies for endometriosis: a review, pp. 67-81, (1990)
[5]  
Meldrum DR, Chang RJ, Lu J., Vale W., Rivier J., Judd HL, “Medical oophorectomy” using a long‐acting GnRH agonist: a possible new approach to the treatment of endometriosis, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 54, pp. 1081-1083, (1982)
[6]  
Shaw RW, Fraser HM, Boyle H., Intranasal treatment with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist in women with endometriosis, Br Med J, 287, pp. 1667-1669, (1983)
[7]  
Lemay A., Maheux R., Faure N., Jeam C., Fazekas A., Reversible hypogonadism induced by a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist (buserelin) as a new therapeutic approach for endometriosis, Fertil Steril, 41, pp. 863-871, (1984)
[8]  
Jenkins GD, The mechanism of action of danazol, a novel steroid derivative, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 20, pp. 113-118, (1980)
[9]  
Guzick DS, Rock JA, A comparison of danazol and conservative surgery for the treatment of infertility due to mild or moderate endometriosis, Fertil Steril, 40, pp. 580-583, (1983)
[10]  
Sutton C., Advances in the surgical management of endometriosis, Endometriosis. Advances in Reproductive Endocrinology, 1, pp. 209-224, (1990)