AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF SURFACE LAY ORIENTATIONS ON INITIAL SURFACE DAMAGE IN POINT CONTACTS

被引:3
作者
WANG, J
WHITLEY, BW
CUSANO, C
CONRY, TF
机构
[1] University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign, Urbana, IL
来源
TRIBOLOGY TRANSACTIONS | 1992年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
ELASTOHYDRODYNAMICS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS EFFECTS;
D O I
10.1080/10402009208982160
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
An experimental investigation to determine the effects of surface roughness lay direction relative to the direction of motion on initial surface damage was conducted using a four-ball machine under both simple sliding and pure rolling point contact conditions. Surface topographies ranging from 0.11 mum (4.45 muin.) to 0.73 mum (28.61 muin.) RMS roughness and 31.5 mum (1239 muin.) to 59.6 mum (2345 muin.) in wavelength were utilized in the experimental program. A lithium complex grease was used as the lubricant for all tests. The experimental results indicate that surfaces with transverse lay orientations cause more initial surface damage than surfaces with longitudinal lay orientations for relatively low ratios of film thickness-to-composite surface roughness, and low ratios of surface wavelength-to-contact radius.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 594
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Archard J., 1965, P I MECH ENGRS 3B, V180, P47, DOI 10.1243/PIME_CONF_1965_180_063_02
[2]   INFLUENCE OF SURFACE-ROUGHNESS ON WEAR [J].
BAYER, RG ;
SIRICO, JL .
WEAR, 1975, 35 (02) :251-260
[3]  
CHANG L, 1991, ASME, V113, P110
[4]  
CHRISTENSEN H, 1970, P I MECH ENG, V184, P1013
[5]  
CUSANO C, 1982, ASME, V104, P365
[6]  
CUSANO C, 1981, T ASLE, V24, P1
[7]  
DESILVA GMS, 1985, MECHANISMS SURFACE D, P258
[8]  
HATA H, 1980, SURFACE ROUGHNESS EF, P75
[9]   EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF SURFACE-ROUGHNESS ON FRICTION [J].
JENG, YR .
TRIBOLOGY TRANSACTIONS, 1990, 33 (03) :402-410
[10]   MICROELASTOHYDRODYNAMIC LUBRICATION OF AN ELLIPTIC CONTACT WITH TRANSVERSE AND 3-DIMENSIONAL SINUSOIDAL ROUGHNESS [J].
KWEH, CC ;
EVANS, HP ;
SNIDLE, RW .
JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1989, 111 (04) :577-584