LLETZ IS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO DIAGNOSTIC COLD-KNIFE CONIZATION

被引:66
作者
NAUMANN, RW [1 ]
BELL, MC [1 ]
ALVAREZ, RD [1 ]
EDWARDS, RP [1 ]
PARTRIDGE, EE [1 ]
HELM, CW [1 ]
SHINGLETON, HM [1 ]
MCGEE, JA [1 ]
HIGGINS, RV [1 ]
HALL, JB [1 ]
机构
[1] CAROLINAS MED CTR,CHARLOTTE,NC 28203
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1994.1281
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) provides a pathologic specimen similar to a cold-knife cone (CKC) biopsy of the cervix. One hundred twenty women with indications for a cone biopsy were evaluated with LLETZ to determine if this procedure is an acceptable alternative to traditional cold-knife conization of the cenix. Ah patients had LLETZ performed in the clinic under local anesthesia. An average of 2.1 slices was required to remove the transformation zone. Coagulation artifact interfered with histologic diagnosis in only 1.8% of specimens. The number of slices taken during the LLETZ procedure significantly correlated with the amount of heat artifact in the pathology specimen (P = 0.02) and interfered with the ability of the pathologist to determine complete excision of dysplasia (P = 0.03). LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic CKC and can offer a substantial cost savings. To facilitate histopathologic interpretation, every effort should be made to minimize the number of slices and to maintain orientation of the LLETZ specimen. Endocervical curettage performed after LLETZ can identify a group of patients who are at high risk for cnv recurrence. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 228
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LLETZ VERSUS LASER-ABLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA [J].
ALVAREZ, RD ;
HELM, CW ;
EDWARDS, RP ;
NAUMANN, RW ;
PARTRIDGE, EE ;
SHINGLETON, HM ;
MCGEE, JA ;
HALL, JB ;
HIGGINS, RV ;
MALONE, JM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1994, 52 (02) :175-179
[2]   COMPARISON OF THERMAL-INJURY ZONES IN LOOP ELECTRICAL AND LASER CERVICAL EXCISIONAL CONIZATION [J].
BAGGISH, MS ;
BARASH, F ;
NOEL, Y ;
BROOKS, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (02) :545-548
[3]  
BENEDET JL, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V65, P557
[4]  
CARTIER R, 1981, 4TH P WORLD C
[5]  
FOWLER JM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P693
[6]   LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE (LLETZ) COMPARED TO CARBON-DIOXIDE LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CIN - A SUPERIOR MODE OF TREATMENT [J].
GUNASEKERA, PC ;
PHIPPS, JH ;
LEWIS, BV .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 97 (11) :995-998
[7]   LOOP DIATHERMY EXCISION OF THE CERVICAL TRANSFORMATION ZONE IN PATIENTS WITH ABNORMAL CERVICAL SMEARS [J].
LUESLEY, DM ;
CULLIMORE, J ;
REDMAN, CWE ;
LAWTON, FG ;
EMENS, JM ;
ROLLASON, TP ;
WILLIAMS, DR ;
BUXTON, EJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6741) :1690-1693
[8]  
MONTZ FJ, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V81, P976
[9]   HISTOLOGICAL INCOMPLETE EXCISION OF CIN AFTER LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE (LLETZ) MERITS CAREFUL FOLLOW-UP, NOT RETREATMENT [J].
MURDOCH, JB ;
MORGAN, PR ;
LOPES, A ;
MONAGHAN, JM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (12) :990-993
[10]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CONE BIOPSY RESECTION MARGINS [J].
PATERSONBROWN, S ;
CHAPPATTE, OA ;
CLARK, SK ;
WRIGHT, A ;
MAXWELL, P ;
TAUB, NA ;
RAJU, KS .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 46 (02) :182-185