STOMATAL RESPONSES TO VARIABLE SUNLIGHT IN BUR OAK (QUERCUS-MACROCARPA MICHX) LEAVES WITH DIFFERENT PHOTOSYNTHETIC CAPACITIES

被引:13
作者
HAMERLYNCK, E
KNAPP, AK
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1086/297196
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Interspecific comparisons of stomatal response to variable light have generally supported the hypothesis that stomatal adjustments are more rapid in plants with high photosynthetic capacity. We compared stomatal responses to variable light in bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) leaves that had low photosynthetic capacity and high apparent anthocyanins levels (''red leaves'') with responses in green leaves. When incident sunlight was experimentally varied, stomatal conductance (g(s)) in red leaves was no less responsive than in green leaves. In both leaf types, g(s) declined at the same rate (18.9 mmol m(-1) s(-1) min(-1)) upon shading and increased at the same rate (13.4 mmol m(-2) s(-1) min(-1)) when reilluminated. The only difference in stomatal response in red leaves was an overall reduction in and compared with green leaves. In shade, net photosynthetic rates (A(net)) in red leaves were very low (ca. 2.3 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) but still nearly 70% of full sun rates (3.2 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)). In contrast, A(net) in green leaves reduced by nearly 50% in shade (7.2 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) relative to fun sun rates(l4.1 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)). Internal CO2 concentrations (C-i) were always ca. 50 mu L L(-1) higher in red than in green leaves. Upon reillumination, A(net) in red leaves immediately returned to preshade levels, while green leaves recovered more slowly, perhaps because of stomatal limitation, as indicated by reduced C-i. We concluded that, although rapid stomatal responses are often correlated with photosynthetic capacity among species, within Quercus macrocarpa, stomatal responses to rapidly varying Light are not related to leaf photosynthetic capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 587
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   STOMATAL RESPONSE TO HUMIDITY IN SUGARCANE AND SOYBEAN - EFFECT OF VAPOR-PRESSURE DIFFERENCE ON THE KINETICS OF THE BLUE-LIGHT RESPONSE [J].
ASSMANN, SM ;
GRANTZ, DA .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1990, 13 (02) :163-169
[2]   COMPARATIVE WATER RELATIONS OF SEEDLING AND ADULT QUERCUS SPECIES DURING GALLERY FOREST EXPANSION IN TALLGRASS PRAIRIE [J].
BRAGG, WK ;
KNAPP, AK ;
BRIGGS, JM .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1993, 56 (1-4) :29-41
[3]   PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND NUTRIENT SUPPLY IN NEEDLES OF SITKA SPRUCE [PICEA-SITCHENSIS (BONG) CARR] [J].
CHANDLER, JW ;
DALE, JE .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1993, 125 (01) :101-111
[4]   PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSES TO LIGHT VARIATION IN RAIN-FOREST SPECIES .1. INDUCTION UNDER CONSTANT AND FLUCTUATING LIGHT CONDITIONS [J].
CHAZDON, RL ;
PEARCY, RW .
OECOLOGIA, 1986, 69 (04) :517-523
[5]   PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSES TO LIGHT VARIATION IN RAIN-FOREST SPECIES .2. CARBON GAIN AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC EFFICIENCY DURING LIGHTFLECKS [J].
CHAZDON, RL ;
PEARCY, RW .
OECOLOGIA, 1986, 69 (04) :524-531
[6]   THE IMPORTANCE OF SUNFLECKS FOR FOREST UNDERSTORY PLANTS - PHOTOSYNTHETIC MACHINERY APPEARS ADAPTED TO BRIEF, UNPREDICTABLE PERIODS OF RADIATION [J].
CHAZDON, RL ;
PEARCY, RW .
BIOSCIENCE, 1991, 41 (11) :760-766
[7]   PHOTOSYNTHETIC AND STOMATAL RESPONSES OF AVENA-SATIVA (POACEAE) TO A VARIABLE LIGHT ENVIRONMENT [J].
FAY, PA ;
KNAPP, AK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1993, 80 (12) :1369-1373
[8]   STOMATAL RESPONSES TO LIGHT AND LEAF-AIR WATER-VAPOR PRESSURE DIFFERENCE SHOW SIMILAR KINETICS IN SUGARCANE AND SOYBEAN [J].
GRANTZ, DA ;
ZEIGER, E .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 81 (03) :865-868
[9]   FACTORS DETERMINING ANTHOCYANIN YIELD IN CELL-CULTURES OF CATHARANTHUS-ROSEUS (L)G DON [J].
HALL, RD ;
YEOMAN, MM .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1986, 103 (01) :33-43
[10]   GAS-EXCHANGE ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF STOMATAL AND BIOCHEMICAL FACTORS IN PHOTOSYNTHETIC INDUCTION IN ALOCASIA-MACRORRHIZA [J].
KIRSCHBAUM, MUF ;
PEARCY, RW .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 86 (03) :782-785