EPIDEMIOLOGY OF FUNGALLY-TRANSMITTED VIRUSES

被引:30
作者
ADAMS, MJ
机构
[1] Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-2743.1990.tb00833.x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Abstract. The recent spread of sugar‐beet rhizomania and barley yellow mosaic virus in Europe has stimulated fresh interest in plant viruses with soil‐borne fungal vectors. Although there are at least 20 such viruses, most of which cause diseases of important field crops, there are many gaps in our knowledge of their epidemiology because much research has concentrated exclusively on the viruses. The vectors are lower fungi that are obligate parasites of plant roots and are therefore difficult to study experimentally. Resting spores containing virus can survive indefinitely in soils but effects of rotation have not been greatly studied. There is no quantitative information relating inoculum levels of fungus and virus to disease development. Only limited information is available about inoculum distribution in soil and factors affecting its potency. The diseases are mostly dispersed by soil movement during agricultural operations but some features of disease distribution in infested fields await adequate explanation. Little is known about interactions with other micro‐organisms. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 189
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Abe H., Tamada T., Association of beet necrotic yellow vein virus with isolates of Polymyxa betae Keskin, Annals of the Psychopathological Society of Japan, 52, pp. 235-247, (1986)
  • [2] Abe H., Ui T., Host range of Polymyxa betae Keskin strains in rhizomania‐infested soils of sugar beet fields in Japan, Japanese Journal of Phytopathology, 52, pp. 394-403, (1986)
  • [3] Adams M.J., Evidence for virus transmission by plasmodiophorid vectors, Viruses with fungal vectors, pp. 203-211, (1988)
  • [4] Barr D.J.S., Morphology and host range of Polymyxa graminis, Polymyxa betae and Ligniera pilorum from Ontario and other areas, Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 1, pp. 85-94, (1979)
  • [5] Brakke M.K., Estes A.P., Some factors affecting vector transmission of soil‐borne wheat mosaic virus from root washings and soil debris, Phytopathology, 57, pp. 905-910, (1967)
  • [6] Brakke M.K., Estes A.P., Schuster M.L., Transmission of soil‐borne wheat mosaic virus, Phytopathology, 55, pp. 79-86, (1965)
  • [7] Campbell R.N., Cultural characteristics and manipulative methods, Viruses with fungal vectors, pp. 153-165, (1988)
  • [8] D'Ambra V., Mutto S., Parassitismo di Trichoderma harzianum su cistosori di Polymyxa betae, Journal of Phytopathology, 115, pp. 61-72, (1986)
  • [9] Gerik J.S., Duffus J.E., Differences in vectoring ability and aggressiveness of isolates of Polymyxa betae, Phytopathology, 78, pp. 1340-1343, (1988)
  • [10] Heijbroek W., Dissemination of rhizomania by soil, beet seeds and stable manure, Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology, 94, pp. 9-15, (1988)