UNGULATE ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOR - PRELIMINARY AND COMPARATIVE DATA FROM AFRICAN BOVIDS

被引:63
作者
CARO, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] SERENGETI WILDLIFE RES INST, ARUSHA, TANZANIA
关键词
D O I
10.1163/156853994X00262
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The adaptive significance of antipredator behaviour patterns was examined in six species of African bovid by recording the behaviours' design features during flights from a human on foot. Snorting signalled awareness of the predator, and did nor warn conspecifics of danger. Leaping in impalas reduced flight speeds and was an honest signal of the performer's physical condition. Bounding was used by many species to clear obstacles. Stotting carried a time cost and it too signalled the prey's physical condition. Tacking and prancing were behaviours shown primarily by Alcelaphines and, respectively, may have served to wrong-foot a predator, and signal that the prey had achieved a safe distance from it. These findings indicate that pursuit deterrent signals ace common in bovids; that some convey specific information about the situation at hand while others pass on additional information about the prey's condition; and that signals of condition are kept honest by being coupled to demonstrated time and probable energetic costs as theory predicts. Across a wider sample of 13 species, pursuit deterrence appears to be associated with plains living species. Where there are few opportunities for hiding, and prey can only evade capture by outdistancing or outmanoeuvring the predator, there may be greater selection on the use of signals to convince the predator to halt its advance.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 228
页数:40
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
ALVAREZ F, 1976, BEHAVIOUR, V56, P299
[2]  
ANDERSSON M, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P804, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00540.x
[3]  
APRHISIART A, 1989, THESIS U OXFORD OXFO
[4]   EVOLUTION OF BIRD COLORATION [J].
BAKER, RR ;
PARKER, GA .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1979, 287 (1018) :63-130
[5]  
Bertram B.C.R., 1978, P64
[6]   WHY WHITE-TAILED DEER FLAG THEIR TAILS [J].
BILDSTEIN, KL .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1983, 121 (05) :709-715
[7]   TYPE-I ERROR RATE OF THE CHI-SQUARE TEST OF INDEPENDENCE IN RXC TABLES THAT HAVE SMALL EXPECTED FREQUENCIES [J].
BRADLEY, DR ;
BRADLEY, TD ;
MCGRATH, SG ;
CUTCOMB, SD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (06) :1290-1297
[8]  
BROOKS PM, 1978, S AFR J WILDL RES, V8, P151
[9]   HUMAN DISTANCE AND BIRDS - TOLERANCE AND RESPONSE DISTANCES OF RESIDENT AND MIGRANT SPECIES IN INDIA [J].
BURGER, J ;
GOCHFELD, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1991, 18 (02) :158-165
[10]   TESTING FOR ASSOCIATION IN 2X2 CONTINGENCY-TABLES WITH VERY SMALL SAMPLE SIZES [J].
CAMILLI, G ;
HOPKINS, KD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (05) :1011-1014