INTRALUMINAL CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT AND MR VISUALIZATION OF THE BOWEL WALL - EFFICACY OF PFOB

被引:19
作者
RUBIN, DL
MULLER, HH
NINOMURCIA, M
SIDHU, M
CHRISTY, V
YOUNG, SW
机构
[1] Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
来源
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | 1991年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; INTESTINES; MR STUDIES; 70.1214; PERFLUOROOCTYLBROMIDE;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880010316
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Efforts to develop satisfactory intraluminal gastrointestinal contrast agents for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have focused on depicting only the bowel lumen to exclude possible involvement by a pathologic process. To determine whether the bowel wall can be adequately imaged with use of the contrast agent and whether bowel wall visualization is a better index of the utility of the contrast agent for MR imaging, perfluorooctylbromide (PFOB) was studied in human subjects. Twenty consecutive patients referred for abdominal or pelvic MR imaging were selected. All patients were given 400-1,000 mL of PFOB orally. MR imaging was performed at 0.38 and 1.5 T with T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo pulse sequences before and after administration of PFOB. The images were graded independently by three blinded readers. All readers reported significantly superior conspicuity of the bowel lumen and wall after PFOB than before PFOB administration (P < .002). Among the post-PFOB studies, those with superior bowel wall visualization demonstrated superior overall image quality. In three patients, lesions were optimally demonstrated because the relationship of the process to the bowel wall, rather than just to the lumen. was identified. In two patients, masses arising within the bowel wall could be identified prospectively only when the bowel wall was adequately imaged. The authors conclude that while lumen identification is improved with PFOB, its greatest clinical utility may be in facilitating intestinal wall visualization.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 380
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Goldberg HI, Thoeni RF, MRI of the gastrointestinal tract, Radiol Clin North Am, 27, pp. 805-812, (1989)
[2]  
Report of the Panel on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis, JAMA, 261, pp. 420-433, (1989)
[3]  
Dooms GC, Hricak H, Tscholakoff D, Adnexal structures: MR imaging, Radiology, 158, pp. 639-646, (1986)
[4]  
Mattrey RF, Perfluorooctylbromide: a new contrast agent for CT, sonography, and MR imaging, AJR, 152, pp. 247-252, (1989)
[5]  
Mattrey RF, Hajek PC, Gylys-Morin VM, Et al., Perfluorochemicals as gastrointestinal contrast agents for MR imaging: preliminary studies in rats and humans, AJR, 148, pp. 1259-1263, (1987)
[6]  
Laniado M, Kornmesser W, Hamm B, Clauss W, Weinmann HJ, Felix R, MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract: value of Gd‐DTPA, AJR, 150, pp. 817-821, (1988)
[7]  
Wesbey GE, Brasch RC, Goldberg HI, Engelstad BL, Moss AA, Dilute oral iron solutions as gastrointestinal contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: initial clinical experience, Magn Reson Imaging, 3, pp. 57-64, (1985)
[8]  
Runge VM, Foster MA, Clanton JA, Et al., Particulate oral NMR contrast agents, Int J Nucl Med Biol, 12, pp. 37-42, (1985)
[9]  
Li KCP, Tart RP, Storm B, Rolfes R, Ang P, Ros PR, MRI oral contrast agents: comparative study of five potential agents in humans (abstr), Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1989, (1989)
[10]  
Newhouse JH, Pykett IL, Brady TJ, Et al., NMR scanning of the abdomen: preliminary results in small animals, Proceedings of the symposium on nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, pp. 121-124, (1981)